Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles
19881.1k citationsKenneth Rogoff, Anne SibertThe Review of Economic Studiesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Sibert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Sibert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Sibert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Sibert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Sibert. The network helps show where Anne Sibert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Sibert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Sibert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Sibert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Sibert. Anne Sibert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sibert, Anne. (2013). The European Commission’s proposed financial transactions tax. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London). 174(13). 6–7.2 indexed citations
4.
Sibert, Anne. (2012). Rating agencies: role and influence of their sovereign credit risk assessment in the Euro area. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London).3 indexed citations
5.
Sibert, Anne. (2011). Debt restructuring: ramifications for the Euro area. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London).1 indexed citations
6.
Sibert, Anne. (2010). Global imbalances and the financial crisis. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London).2 indexed citations
7.
Schwartz, Peter J., et al.. (2009). Comparison of the monetary policy strategies of the major central banks. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London).
8.
Sibert, Anne. (2009). Undersized: could Greenland be the new Iceland? should it be?. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London).2 indexed citations
9.
Sibert, Anne. (2009). Assessment of the banking rescue packages of the member states: United Kingdom. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London).1 indexed citations
10.
Sibert, Anne. (2006). Is Central Bank Transparency Desirable. SSRN Electronic Journal.11 indexed citations
Buiter, Willem H. & Anne Sibert. (2005). How the Eurosystem's Treatment of Collateral in its Open Market Operations Weakens Fiscal Discipline in the Eurozone (and What to Do About it). SSRN Electronic Journal.26 indexed citations
Sibert, Anne & William Perraudin. (2000). The Timing of Multilateral Lending. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Buiter, Willem H. & Anne Sibert. (1999). UDROP: A Small Contribution to the New International Financial Architecture. SSRN Electronic Journal.10 indexed citations
Rogoff, Kenneth & Anne Sibert. (1988). Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles. The Review of Economic Studies. 55(1). 1–1.1066 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.