Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Risk Shocks
2013823 citationsLawrence J. Christiano, Roberto Motto et al.American Economic Reviewprofile →
Electoral Systems and Public Spending
2002452 citationsGian Maria Milesi‐Ferretti, Roberto Perotti et al.The Quarterly Journal of Economicsprofile →
Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations
2010340 citationsLawrence J. Christiano, Roberto Motto et al.SSRN Electronic Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Massimo Rostagno
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo Rostagno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo Rostagno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo Rostagno more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo Rostagno
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo Rostagno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo Rostagno. The network helps show where Massimo Rostagno may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Massimo Rostagno
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Massimo Rostagno.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Massimo Rostagno based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Massimo Rostagno. Massimo Rostagno is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Christiano, Lawrence J., Roberto Motto, & Massimo Rostagno. (2013). Risk Shocks. American Economic Review. 104(1). 27–65.823 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Motto, Roberto, Massimo Rostagno, & Lawrence J. Christiano. (2010). Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Smets, Frank, Kai Christoffel, Günter Coenen, Roberto Motto, & Massimo Rostagno. (2010). DSGE models and their use at the ECB. SERIEs. 1(1-2). 51–65.19 indexed citations
9.
Christiano, Lawrence J., Roberto Motto, & Massimo Rostagno. (2009). Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations ∗ (Preliminary).14 indexed citations
10.
Motto, Roberto, Massimo Rostagno, & Lawrence J. Christiano. (2008). Financial Factors in Business Cycles. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.85 indexed citations
Milesi‐Ferretti, Gian Maria, Roberto Perotti, & Massimo Rostagno. (2002). Electoral Systems and Public Spending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 117(2). 609–657.452 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Milesi‐Ferretti, Gian Maria, Roberto Perotti, & Massimo Rostagno. (2001). Electoral Rules and Public Spending. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
15.
Christiano, Lawrence J. & Massimo Rostagno. (2001). Money Growth Monitoring and the Taylor Rule. National Bureau of Economic Research.40 indexed citations
Milesi‐Ferretti, Gian Maria, Roberto Perotti, & Massimo Rostagno. (2001). Electoral Systems and Public Spending. SSRN Electronic Journal.51 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.