Anne Pollock

35 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Anne Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Business and International Management 17
  • Reproductive Medicine 39
  • Human-Computer Interaction 25
  • Geography, Planning and Development 21
  • Gender Studies 33
Replace Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner with:
Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner United Kingdom
Thomas Schlich Canada
Christine Hauskeller United Kingdom
Steve Davies United Kingdom
Kaori Muto Japan
Vardit Ravitsky Canada
Michelle L. McGowan United States
Howard Wolinsky United States
Tamra Lysaght Singapore
James Brown United Kingdom
Anne Pollock relative to Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner United Kingdom Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Pollock. The network helps show where Anne Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Anne Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202210
2 20219
3 20188
4 201811
5 20174
6 20175
7 201633
8 201558
9 20157
10 20147
11 20148
12 201410
13 20132
14 201345
15 201255
16 20086
17 200811
18 200275
19 19996
20 19985

About Anne Pollock

Anne Pollock is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Museology, Reproductive Medicine and Gender Studies, having authored 37 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biotechnology and Related Fields (3 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (2 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (17 citations), Reproductive Medicine (39 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (25 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (21 citations) and Gender Studies (33 citations). Anne Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include C. Pollock, Colin Marsh, Marie E. Mathers, H. Pollock, Marie O’Donnell, Banu Subramaniam, Lauren Paremoer, David S. Jones, Nassim JafariNaimi and Yanni Alexander Loukissas. Their work appears in journals such as BioSocieties, Social Studies of Science, Science Technology & Human Values, Clinical Kidney Journal and The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026