Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Wave of net zero emission targets opens window to meeting the Paris Agreement
2021178 citationsNiklas Höhne, Matthew Gidden et al.Nature Climate Changeprofile →
Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk
202388 citationsJoeri Rogelj, Taryn Fransen et al.Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic Hans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic Hans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic Hans more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic Hans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic Hans. The network helps show where Frederic Hans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederic Hans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederic Hans.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederic Hans based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frederic Hans. Frederic Hans is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Rogelj, Joeri, Taryn Fransen, Michel den Elzen, et al.. (2023). Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk. Science. 380(6649). 1014–1016.88 indexed citations breakdown →
Höhne, Niklas, Matthew Gidden, Michel den Elzen, et al.. (2021). Wave of net zero emission targets opens window to meeting the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change. 11(10). 820–822.178 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Nascimento, Leonardo, Takeshi Kuramochi, Frederic Hans, et al.. (2021). Greenhouse gas mitigation scenarios for major emitting countries – Analysis of current climate policies and mitigation commitments: 2021 Update. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).7 indexed citations
Soest, Heleen van, Nicklas Forsell, Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga, et al.. (2020). Overview of recently adopted mitigation policies and climate-relevant policy responses to COVID-19 – 2020 Update. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).2 indexed citations
12.
Höhne, Niklas, Taryn Fransen, Frederic Hans, et al.. (2019). Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Mitigation Ambitionand Action at G20 Level and Globally. Pre-release version of a chapter in the forthcoming UNEP Emissions Gap Report 2019.
13.
Day, Thomas A., Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga, Niklas Höhne, et al.. (2018). Opportunity 2030: Benefits of climate action in cities.1 indexed citations
Kuramochi, Takeshi, Niklas Höhne, Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga, et al.. (2016). Greenhouse gas mitigation scenarios for major emitting countries - Analysis of current climate policies and mitigation pledges. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.