Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Climate
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Climate. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Climate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Climate more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Climate
This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Climate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Climate.
About Frontiers in Climate
The 819 papers published in Frontiers in Climate in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Frontiers in Climate usually cover Global and Planetary Change (420 papers), Atmospheric Science (163 papers) and Oceanography (104 papers) specifically the topics of Climate variability and models (169 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (120 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (84 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (82 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (79 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (74 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (60 papers) and Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Climate are Panu Pihkala, Peter Psarras, Jennifer Wilcox, Hélène Pilorgé, Sally M. Benson, P. B. Kelemen, Phil Renforth, Jan Andre Wurzbacher, Jean‐Pierre Gattuso and Phillip Williamson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.