Anne Minert

555 citations
24 papers · 446 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Minert

22 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Anne Minert
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Developmental Neuroscience 93
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 223
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 184
  • Physiology 159
Replace Małgorzata Borczyk with:
Małgorzata Borczyk Poland
J. J. Ballesteros Spain
Kathleen F. Vincent United States
Christiane Corréa-Sales United States
Maria T. Caserta United States
Olivia A. Moody United States
Daniela Mohr Germany
C. B. Pert United States
Kavitha Abiraman United States
Antonio Martínez-Simón Spain
Anne Minert relative to Małgorzata Borczyk Poland Małgorzata Borczyk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Małgorzata Borczyk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Minert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Minert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Minert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Minert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Minert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Minert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Minert. The network helps show where Anne Minert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Minert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Minert Line = papers co-authored together Anne Minert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010102
2 201737
3 201334
4 201531
5 200728
6 201027
7 200727
8 201621
9 201919
10 201619
11 201217
12 201716
13 200714
14 201611
15 202110
16 20078
17 20178
18 20207
19 20225
20 20213

About Anne Minert

Anne Minert is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Developmental Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (8 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (7 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (93 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (223 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (65 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (184 citations) and Physiology (159 citations). Anne Minert has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Marshall Devor, Michael Tal, Ariel Darvasi, Anne Pisanté, J. Nissenbaum, Mark S. Baron, Benjamin Yakir, Ze’ev Seltzer, Hagai Y. Shpigler and Anna‐Karin Persson. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Pain, Neuroscience, Neuropharmacology and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact