Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Who takes the credit? Gender, power, and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Marie Goetz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Marie Goetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Marie Goetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Marie Goetz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Marie Goetz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Marie Goetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Marie Goetz. The network helps show where Anne Marie Goetz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Marie Goetz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Marie Goetz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Marie Goetz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Marie Goetz. Anne Marie Goetz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Goetz, Anne Marie. (2018). Has Democracy Failed Women?. Gender & Development. 26(1). 214–216.14 indexed citations
3.
Hudson, Natalie Florea & Anne Marie Goetz. (2014). Too Much That Can't Be Said. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 16(2). 336–346.6 indexed citations
4.
Goetz, Anne Marie, et al.. (2008). Voice and Women's Empowerment: Mapping a Research Agenda. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).11 indexed citations
5.
Ebrahim, Alnoor, Alnoor Ebrahim, Edward Weisband, et al.. (2007). Global Accountabilities. Cambridge University Press eBooks.79 indexed citations
Gauthier, Bernard, Rob Jenkins, Michael Kremer, et al.. (2004). Development outreach 6 (1) : Client power making services work for the poor. 6. 1–44.1 indexed citations
Goetz, Anne Marie. (2004). Women's education and political participation.5 indexed citations
11.
Goetz, Anne Marie, et al.. (2003). State Responsiveness to Poverty: A Comparative Study of development interventions in the Indian States of Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh..2 indexed citations
12.
Goetz, Anne Marie. (2001). Women Development Workers: Implementing Rural Credit Programmes in Bangladesh.53 indexed citations
13.
Luckham, Robin, Mary Kaldor, & Anne Marie Goetz. (2000). Democratic institutions and politics in contexts of inequality, poverty, and conflict: a conceptual framework. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).26 indexed citations
Goetz, Anne Marie. (1995). The politics of integrating gender to State development processes : trends, opportunities and constraints in Bangladesh, Chile, Jamaica, Mali, Morocco and Uganda. Econstor (Econstor).29 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.