Anne M. Prouty

820 total citations
30 papers, 561 citations indexed

About

Anne M. Prouty is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne M. Prouty has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 561 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Clinical Psychology, 17 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Anne M. Prouty's work include Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (8 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers). Anne M. Prouty is often cited by papers focused on Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (8 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers). Anne M. Prouty collaborates with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and South Korea. Anne M. Prouty's co-authors include Howard Protinsky, Joyce A. Arditti, Scott W. Johnson, Volker Thomas, K. Mark Derby, Elizabeth Stoner, Douglas B. Smith, Wendy Berg, David P. Wacker and Jennifer M. Asmus and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Family Process and Journal of Marital and Family Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Anne M. Prouty

29 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne M. Prouty United States 14 304 234 118 101 86 30 561
Eveline van Vugt Netherlands 14 411 1.4× 179 0.8× 182 1.5× 61 0.6× 56 0.7× 26 752
Nicholas Mazza United States 18 428 1.4× 254 1.1× 101 0.9× 56 0.6× 42 0.5× 47 807
Cassandra K. Dittman Australia 14 382 1.3× 118 0.5× 91 0.8× 52 0.5× 30 0.3× 37 540
Susan J. Frank United States 14 344 1.1× 190 0.8× 132 1.1× 101 1.0× 20 0.2× 35 575
Victoria del Barrio Spain 17 543 1.8× 387 1.7× 102 0.9× 26 0.3× 36 0.4× 41 778
Mark E. Young United States 15 463 1.5× 507 2.2× 77 0.7× 43 0.4× 47 0.5× 39 788
Jeremy M. Hamm United States 16 96 0.3× 306 1.3× 59 0.5× 81 0.8× 33 0.4× 56 625
Linda M. Montgomery United States 11 443 1.5× 318 1.4× 96 0.8× 47 0.5× 17 0.2× 17 723
Bernhard Leipold Germany 11 316 1.0× 159 0.7× 128 1.1× 27 0.3× 41 0.5× 29 621
Donna Follansbee United States 11 324 1.1× 152 0.6× 86 0.7× 78 0.8× 17 0.2× 14 621

Countries citing papers authored by Anne M. Prouty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne M. Prouty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne M. Prouty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne M. Prouty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne M. Prouty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne M. Prouty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne M. Prouty. The network helps show where Anne M. Prouty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne M. Prouty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne M. Prouty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne M. Prouty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne M. Prouty. Anne M. Prouty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2025). Consensual Non-Monogamy: Experiences and Insights from Türkiye. 36(4). 392–426. 1 indexed citations
2.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2023). Young Adults’ Romantic Disillusionment as a Function of Family-of-Origin Dynamics. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 23(1). 40–61.
3.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2020). Feminist Family Therapy in Turkey: Experiences of Couple and Family Therapists. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 33(2). 105–130. 4 indexed citations
4.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2015). Effects of parental infidelity and interparental conflict on relational ethics between adult children and parents: a contextual perspective. Journal of Family Therapy. 38(3). 386–408. 17 indexed citations
5.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2015). Spiritual Coping: A Gateway to Enhancing Family Communication During Cancer Treatment. Journal of Religion and Health. 55(1). 269–287. 9 indexed citations
6.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2015). Systemic approaches: Family therapy.. 1 indexed citations
7.
Prouty, Anne M.. (2015). Co-Constructing Courses with Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) Graduate Students: Favoring Process over Content. Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 26(2). 122–138. 1 indexed citations
8.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2015). Development of the “Mentorship in Clinical Training Scale” (MiCTS). Contemporary Family Therapy. 38(2). 140–158. 3 indexed citations
9.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2014). Differentiation of Self and Its Relationship With Family Functioning in South Koreans. American Journal of Family Therapy. 42(3). 257–265. 23 indexed citations
10.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2014). Parents’ Experiences of Intergenerational Value Transmission in Turkey’s Changing Society: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study. Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 25(1). 42–65. 10 indexed citations
11.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2013). Differentiation and Healthy Family Functioning of Koreans in South Korea, South Koreans in the United States, and White Americans. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 41(1). 72–85. 31 indexed citations
12.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2006). Multidisciplinary Patient Education for Total Joint Replacement Surgery Patients. Orthopaedic Nursing. 25(4). 257???261–257???261. 46 indexed citations
13.
Prouty, Anne M. & Howard Protinsky. (2002). Feminist-Informed Internal Family Systems Therapy with Couples. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 1(3). 21–36. 5 indexed citations
14.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2002). We've Come a Long Way?. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 13(2-3). 169–190. 23 indexed citations
15.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2001). METHODS OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY SUPERVISION. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 27(1). 85–97. 42 indexed citations
16.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2001). DO WE REALLY UNDERSTAND? AN EXPERIENTIAL EXERCISE FOR TRAINING FAMILY THERAPISTS. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 27(4). 535–544. 18 indexed citations
17.
Prouty, Anne M., Scott Johnson, & Howard Protinsky. (2000). RECRUITING THE NEXT GENERATION OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPISTS THROUGH UNDERGRADUATE INTERNSHIPS. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 26(1). 47–50. 12 indexed citations
18.
Prouty, Anne M., et al.. (2000). Using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale in Marital Therapy: An Exploratory Study. The Family Journal. 8(3). 250–257. 25 indexed citations
19.
Arditti, Joyce A. & Anne M. Prouty. (1999). CHANGE, DISENGAGEMENT, AND RENEWAL: RELATIONSHIP DYNAMICS BETWEEN YOUNG ADULTS AND THEIR FATHERS AFTER DIVORCE. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 25(1). 61–81. 28 indexed citations
20.
Derby, K. Mark, David P. Wacker, Wendy Berg, et al.. (1997). THE LONG‐TERM EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING IN HOME SETTINGS. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 30(3). 507–531. 100 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026