Anne M. Prouty

44 total papers · 818 total citations
30 papers, 556 citations indexed

About

Anne M. Prouty is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne M. Prouty has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 556 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Clinical Psychology, 17 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Anne M. Prouty's work include Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (8 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers). Anne M. Prouty is often cited by papers focused on Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (8 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers). Anne M. Prouty collaborates with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and South Korea. Anne M. Prouty's co-authors include Howard Protinsky, Joyce A. Arditti, Scott W. Johnson, Volker Thomas, Jennifer M. Asmus, Douglas B. Smith, David P. Wacker, Jay W. Harding, K. Mark Derby and Wendy Berg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Family Process and Journal of Marital and Family Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Anne M. Prouty

28 papers receiving 516 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Anne M. Prouty	304	230	116	102	87	30	556
Jacob Lomranz	236 0.8×	201 0.9×	140 1.2×	63 0.6×	41 0.5×	40	697
A. L. Greene	182 0.6×	159 0.7×	217 1.9×	105 1.0×	53 0.6×	24	682
Larry J. Bloom	254 0.8×	182 0.8×	108 0.9×	28 0.3×	62 0.7×	34	655
Susan J. Frank	344 1.1×	190 0.8×	133 1.1×	101 1.0×	20 0.2×	35	575
Jordan A. Booker	414 1.4×	245 1.1×	138 1.2×	180 1.8×	49 0.6×	47	627
Lenore T. Szuchman	140 0.5×	162 0.7×	159 1.4×	85 0.8×	106 1.2×	26	535
Carolynn S. Kohn	171 0.6×	152 0.7×	93 0.8×	72 0.7×	39 0.4×	33	647
Erin Hiley Sharp	168 0.6×	239 1.0×	208 1.8×	79 0.8×	38 0.4×	33	650
Ety Berant	381 1.3×	362 1.6×	106 0.9×	27 0.3×	116 1.3×	34	689
Claudia Lampman	255 0.8×	154 0.7×	171 1.5×	78 0.8×	26 0.3×	21	635

Countries citing papers authored by Anne M. Prouty

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne M. Prouty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne M. Prouty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne M. Prouty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne M. Prouty

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne M. Prouty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne M. Prouty. The network helps show where Anne M. Prouty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne M. Prouty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne M. Prouty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne M. Prouty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne M. Prouty. Anne M. Prouty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact