Anne Clancy

24 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Anne Clancy
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 25
  • Research and Theory 9
  • General Health Professions 169
  • Health 56
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
Replace Derya Adıbelli with:
Derya Adıbelli Türkiye
Shu‐Yuan Chao Taiwan
Martha Porter United States
Uta Gaidys Germany
Pei‐Lun Hsieh Taiwan
Unni Å. Lindström Finland
David Sines United Kingdom
Linda L. Eddy United States
Ann‐Christin Janlöv Sweden
María Magdalena Alonso Castillo Mexico
Anne Clancy relative to Derya Adıbelli Türkiye Derya Adıbelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Derya Adıbelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Clancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Clancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Clancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Clancy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Clancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Clancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Clancy. The network helps show where Anne Clancy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Anne Clancy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Clancy Line = papers co-authored together Anne Clancy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202061
2 202046
3 201742
4 201441
5 201841
6 200735
7 201525
8 201619
9 201318
10 201711
11 201110
12 20198
13 20215
14 20205
15 20215
16 20234
17 20223
18 20233
19 20192
20 20182

About Anne Clancy

Anne Clancy is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (6 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers) and Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (25 citations), Research and Theory (9 citations), General Health Professions (169 citations), Health (56 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations). Anne Clancy has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Tommy Svensson, Nina Simonsen, Aud Johannessen, Gabriele Kitzmüller, Mojtaba Vaismoradi, Terese Bondas, Charlotte Wegener, Bettina Stenbock‐Hult, Lena Zidén and Anneli Sarvimäki. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Ethics, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Public Health Nursing and Scandinavian Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact