Annabel Vreeker

69 total papers · 1.7k total citations
30 papers, 616 citations indexed

About

Annabel Vreeker is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Annabel Vreeker has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 616 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 8 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Annabel Vreeker's work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (13 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers). Annabel Vreeker is often cited by papers focused on Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (13 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers). Annabel Vreeker collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Annabel Vreeker's co-authors include Manon H. J. Hillegers, René S. Kahn, Marco P. Boks, Esther Mesman, Roel A. Ophoff, Annet H. van Bergen, Lucija Abramovic, Sanne Verkooijen, James H. MacCabe and Neeltje E.M. van Haren and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Medicine, Journal of Affective Disorders and Psychopharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Annabel Vreeker

27 papers receiving 606 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Annabel Vreeker 262 180 140 94 76 30 616
Naohisa Tsujino 298 1.1× 164 0.9× 194 1.4× 88 0.9× 85 1.1× 47 660
Denise Bernier 207 0.8× 172 1.0× 159 1.1× 115 1.2× 88 1.2× 22 546
Philip Sumner 248 0.9× 138 0.8× 175 1.3× 99 1.1× 44 0.6× 42 555
Alexandra B. Whitworth 274 1.0× 211 1.2× 111 0.8× 63 0.7× 62 0.8× 17 633
E. Lauronen 297 1.1× 270 1.5× 96 0.7× 90 1.0× 31 0.4× 21 621
Sarah Trost 148 0.6× 91 0.5× 238 1.7× 122 1.3× 72 0.9× 32 597
Berna Uluğ 161 0.6× 190 1.1× 152 1.1× 67 0.7× 58 0.8× 23 572
Nobuki Kitagawa 136 0.5× 242 1.3× 97 0.7× 135 1.4× 51 0.7× 33 672
Kiwon Kim 131 0.5× 125 0.7× 127 0.9× 151 1.6× 41 0.5× 38 627
Srikala Bharath 232 0.9× 122 0.7× 139 1.0× 38 0.4× 58 0.8× 47 667

Countries citing papers authored by Annabel Vreeker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabel Vreeker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabel Vreeker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabel Vreeker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabel Vreeker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabel Vreeker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabel Vreeker. The network helps show where Annabel Vreeker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annabel Vreeker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annabel Vreeker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annabel Vreeker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annabel Vreeker. Annabel Vreeker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026