Anne‐Laura van Harmelen
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ian GoodyerBernet M. ElzingaRogier KievitBrenda W.J.H. PenninxPhilip SpinhovenJessica FritzPaul WilkinsonPeter B. Jones
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (27 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (25 papers)Resilience and Mental Health (18 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anne‐Laura van Harmelen
62 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Clinical Psychology 2.2k
- Social Psychology 713
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 695
- Cognitive Neuroscience 571
- Psychiatry and Mental health 370
Countries citing papers authored by Anne‐Laura van Harmelen
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne‐Laura van Harmelen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne‐Laura van Harmelen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne‐Laura van Harmelen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne‐Laura van Harmelen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne‐Laura van Harmelen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne‐Laura van Harmelen. The network helps show where Anne‐Laura van Harmelen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne‐Laura van Harmelen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne‐Laura van Harmelen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne‐Laura van Harmelen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne‐Laura van Harmelen. Anne‐Laura van Harmelen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 86 | |
| 20 | 189 |
About Anne‐Laura van Harmelen
Anne‐Laura van Harmelen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (27 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (25 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.2k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (364 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (695 citations). Anne‐Laura van Harmelen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian Goodyer, Bernet M. Elzinga, Rogier Kievit, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx, Philip Spinhoven, Jessica Fritz, Paul Wilkinson, Peter B. Jones, Konstantinos Ioannidis and Marie‐José van Tol. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.