Anna Seriola

485 citations
12 papers · 353 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Seriola

12 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Anna Seriola
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 92
  • Biophysics 28
  • Reproductive Medicine 30
  • Molecular Biology 240
  • Immunology and Allergy 13
Replace Nigel H Brookes with:
Nigel H Brookes New Zealand
Kiyoko Izawa Japan
Anna Yoney United States
Gianluca Amadei United Kingdom
Wei‐Hung Jung United States
Fanny Momboisse France
Dario Melguizo‐Sanchis Spain
Vivienne Wilkins United Kingdom
Seok Hong Min United States
Anna Seriola relative to Nigel H Brookes New Zealand Nigel H Brookes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nigel H Brookes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Seriola

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Seriola's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Seriola with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Seriola more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Seriola

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Seriola. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Seriola. The network helps show where Anna Seriola may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Seriola, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Seriola Line = papers co-authored together Anna Seriola links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201070
2 202067
3 201742
4 201542
5 201932
6 201631
7 201727
8 201621
9 20149
10 20249
11 20252
12 20071

About Anna Seriola

Anna Seriola is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cell Biology and Physiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (92 citations), Biophysics (28 citations), Reproductive Medicine (30 citations), Molecular Biology (240 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (13 citations). Anna Seriola has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anna Veiga, Samuel Ojosnegros, Karen Sermon, Claudia Spits, Jodie P. Simard, Patrick Haentjens, Christopher E. Pearson, Pierre Hilven, Francesco Cutrale and Elena Martínez. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development, Fertility and Sterility, Nano Letters and Nature Protocols.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact