Anna Schroeder

19 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

Anna Schroeder
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 157
  • Biological Psychiatry 107
  • Reproductive Medicine 84
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
  • Social Psychology 109
Replace Natalia Lagunas with:
Natalia Lagunas Spain
Andrea Locci United States
Melinda G. Arnett United States
Shannon L. Dean United States
Jessica A. Henderson United States
B. Lorenz United States
Christel Vanbesien-Mailliot France
Rand Mahmoud Canada
Filippo Ninni Italy
Daniela Grassi Spain
Anna Schroeder relative to Natalia Lagunas Spain Natalia Lagunas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Natalia Lagunas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Schroeder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schroeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Schroeder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schroeder. The network helps show where Anna Schroeder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Schroeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Schroeder Line = papers co-authored together Anna Schroeder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200581
2 201553
3 201842
4 201837
5 201534
6 202133
7 201928
8 201725
9 202021
10 201917
11 202014
12 202010
13 20237
14 20227
15 20187
16 20235
17 20205
18 20213
19 20211

About Anna Schroeder

Anna Schroeder is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Biological Psychiatry, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (11 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (8 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (7 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (157 citations), Biological Psychiatry (107 citations), Reproductive Medicine (84 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations) and Social Psychology (109 citations). Anna Schroeder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Hill, Xin Du, Maarten van den Buuse, Suresh Sundram, Michael Notaras, Astrid Becker, András Bilkei‐Gorzó, Andreas Zimmer, Andrew S. Gibbons and Konstantinos Dafopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Behavior and Immunity, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, BioMetals and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact