Anna Renom‐Guiteras
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Family Practice top 1%
- Co-authors
- Gabriele MeyerPetra ThürmannKai SaksAdelaida ZabaleguiCaroline SutcliffeMaría SotoR. Albert MohlerAstrid Stephan
- Topics
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (20 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers)Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anna Renom‐Guiteras
40 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 654
- Psychiatry and Mental health 434
- General Health Professions 427
- Economics and Econometrics 316
- Family Practice 214
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Renom‐Guiteras
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Renom‐Guiteras's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Renom‐Guiteras with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Renom‐Guiteras more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Renom‐Guiteras
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Renom‐Guiteras. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Renom‐Guiteras. The network helps show where Anna Renom‐Guiteras may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Renom‐Guiteras
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Renom‐Guiteras. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Renom‐Guiteras based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Renom‐Guiteras. Anna Renom‐Guiteras is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3breakdown → | 216 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 65 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 117 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Anna Renom‐Guiteras
Anna Renom‐Guiteras is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (20 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (654 citations), Family Practice (214 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (434 citations). Anna Renom‐Guiteras has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gabriele Meyer, Petra Thürmann, Kai Saks, Adelaida Zabalegui, Caroline Sutcliffe, María Soto, R. Albert Mohler, Astrid Stephan, Hilde Verbeek and David Challis. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Age and Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.