Anna Prinster

3.1k citations
60 papers · 2.0k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Prinster

58 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Anna Prinster
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 609
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 532
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 256
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 272
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 294
Replace Li Feng with:
Li Feng China
Matthias Reimold Germany
Ellen L. Air United States
Jee Eun Lee United States
Shingo Kakeda Japan
Ken Okada Japan
S. Asenbaum Austria
Edwin Mak Canada
Qing Lü China
Donna J. Cross United States
Anna Prinster relative to Li Feng China Li Feng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Li Feng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Prinster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Prinster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Prinster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Prinster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Prinster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Prinster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Prinster. The network helps show where Anna Prinster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Prinster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Prinster Line = papers co-authored together Anna Prinster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20230
3 202115
4 20206
5 20189
6 201813
7 201750
8 201733
9 201716
10 201613
11
Biofeedback Rehabilitation in Patients with Stargardt disease: a randomized controlled trial.
20161
12 2015160
13 201433
14 201118
15 201118
16 201065
17 20084
18 200627
19 2005141
20 199736

About Anna Prinster

Anna Prinster is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (609 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (532 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (256 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (272 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (294 citations). Anna Prinster has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mario Quarantelli, Marco Salvatore, Arturo Brunetti, Elena Salvatore, Bruno Alfano, Jean‐Claude Baron, Roberta Lanzillo, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Giovanni Annuzzi and Angela A. Rivellese. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, PLoS ONE, European Journal of Clinical Investigation and Multiple Sclerosis Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026