Anna Nobili
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 10%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Papers in
-
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 3
- Resilience and Mental Health 2
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 2
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 1
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 3
- Co-authors
- Cris Glazebrook (3 shared papers)Rebecca Upsher (4 shared papers)Nicola Byrom (4 shared papers)Gareth Hughes (3 shared papers)Walter Pierre Bouman (2 shared papers)Jon Arcelus (2 shared papers)Simon Baron‐Cohen (2 shared papers)Carrie Allison (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Educational Research Review (1 paper)Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (1 paper)Higher Education (1 paper)Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (1 paper)International Journal of Transgender Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anna Nobili
7 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Social Psychology 146
- Clinical Psychology 106
- Reproductive Medicine 23
- Cognitive Neuroscience 51
- Gender Studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Nobili
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Nobili's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Nobili with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Nobili more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Nobili
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Nobili. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Nobili. The network helps show where Anna Nobili may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Anna Nobili, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 135 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 5 |
About Anna Nobili
Anna Nobili is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (1 paper) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (146 citations), Clinical Psychology (106 citations), Reproductive Medicine (23 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (51 citations) and Gender Studies (21 citations). Anna Nobili has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cris Glazebrook, Rebecca Upsher, Nicola Byrom, Gareth Hughes, Walter Pierre Bouman, Jon Arcelus, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Carrie Allison, Paula Smith and Juliet Foster. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Research Review, Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Higher Education, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and International Journal of Transgender Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.