Anna Miles

117 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Anna Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Speech and Hearing 1.1k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 765
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 294
  • Physiology 416
  • Surgery 635
Replace Giselle Carnaby with:
Giselle Carnaby United States
Koichiro Matsuo Japan
Ashwini Namasivayam‐MacDonald Canada
Margaret Walshe Ireland
JoAnne Robbins United States
Gary H. McCullough United States
Jacqueline Hind United States
Steven B. Leder United States
Takeshi Kikutani Japan
Michael E. Groher United States
Anna Miles relative to Giselle Carnaby United States Giselle Carnaby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Giselle Carnaby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Miles. The network helps show where Anna Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Miles Line = papers co-authored together Anna Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201366
2 201757
3 202057
4 201950
5 201649
6 202045
7 201542
8 201340
9 202035
10 201935
11 201834
12 202134
13 201534
14 201931
15 201831
16 201730
17 201229
18 201929
19 201728
20 201828

About Anna Miles

Anna Miles is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 130 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dysphagia Assessment and Management (95 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (64 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (54 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (26 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (24 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (6 papers) and Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (1.1k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (765 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (294 citations), Physiology (416 citations) and Surgery (635 citations). Anna Miles has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jacqui Allen, Andrea Braakhuis, Mary McFarlane, Maggie‐Lee Huckabee, Jacqueline Allen, Debra Phyland, Fiona Lee, Emma Daly, Emma Green and John Fink. Their work appears in journals such as Dysphagia, Speech Language and Hearing, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery and American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact