Anna M.H. Korver
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Otorhinolaryngology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Anne Marie Oudesluys‐MurphyFriedo W. DekkerLawrence R. LustigAn BoudewynsMaria Bitner‐GlindziczRichard J. SmithGuy Van CampShin‐ichi Usami
- Topics
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers)Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (6 papers)Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anna M.H. Korver
16 papers receiving 809 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Sensory Systems 429
- Cognitive Neuroscience 317
- Epidemiology 217
- Otorhinolaryngology 172
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 138
Countries citing papers authored by Anna M.H. Korver
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M.H. Korver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M.H. Korver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M.H. Korver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M.H. Korver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M.H. Korver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M.H. Korver. The network helps show where Anna M.H. Korver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M.H. Korver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M.H. Korver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M.H. Korver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M.H. Korver. Anna M.H. Korver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Congenital hearing lossbreakdown → | 341 |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | National study of newborn hearing screening: programme sensitivity and characteristics of undetected children. | 4 |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 168 | |
| 11 | Impact and benefits of early hearing screening | 0 |
| 12 | 47 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | [Permanent hearing loss in the prelingual phase in children with a non-aberrant neonatal hearing screening result]. | 3 |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | [Diagnostic image (329). A girl with haemorrhagic bullae]. | 3 |
About Anna M.H. Korver
Anna M.H. Korver is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Otorhinolaryngology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (6 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (429 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (172 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (317 citations). Anna M.H. Korver has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anne Marie Oudesluys‐Murphy, Friedo W. Dekker, Lawrence R. Lustig, An Boudewyns, Maria Bitner‐Glindzicz, Richard J. Smith, Guy Van Camp, Shin‐ichi Usami, Mark R. Schleiss and Johan H. M. Frijns. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Nature Reviews Disease Primers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.