Anna M. Celler

5.1k citations
208 papers · 3.7k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Anna M. Celler

198 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Anna M. Celler
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.9k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.0k
  • Radiation 84
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 16
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 53
Replace Α. Hermanne with:
Α. Hermanne Belgium
Guenter Lauritsch Germany
Peter L. Roberson United States
Lan Gao United States
L. Donadille France
Frédéric Melot France
Tim C. de Wit Netherlands
Sytze Brandenburg Netherlands
F. Cassol-Brunner France
Christian Moisan Canada
Anna M. Celler relative to Α. Hermanne Belgium Α. Hermanne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.8×
Α. Hermanne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Celler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Celler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Celler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Celler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Celler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Celler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Celler. The network helps show where Anna M. Celler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna M. Celler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna M. Celler Line = papers co-authored together Anna M. Celler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 208 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015276
2 1994107
3 1989101
4 200894
5 201581
6 201480
7 199079
8 199079
9 199874
10 198870
11 201165
12 201063
13 199359
14 198657
15 201854
16 199553
17 201752
18 202052
19 201451
20 201150

About Anna M. Celler

Anna M. Celler is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 208 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (93 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (42 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (26 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (6 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (3 papers) and Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.9k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.0k citations), Radiation (84 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (16 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (53 citations). Anna M. Celler has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Harrop, Andriy Andreyev, Sergey Shcherbinin, Arkadiusz Sitek, Xinchi Hou, K. Peter Jackson, Yuni K. Dewaraja, Carlos Uribe, R. L. Helmer and S. Yen. Their work appears in journals such as Physics in Medicine and Biology, Physical Review C, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Medical Physics and Physics Letters B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact