Tim C. de Wit

1.8k citations
28 papers · 974 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Tim C. de Wit

28 papers receiving 962 citations

Peers

Tim C. de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 522
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 455
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 278
  • Radiation 114
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 299
Replace Rowan M. Thomson with:
Rowan M. Thomson Canada
Alexander M. Grant United States
J. W. Harris United States
Suguru Dobashi Japan
Hung‐Sheng Tsao United States
Martin Kretzschmar Germany
Hajime Aoki Japan
T. Okuda Japan
Dahl Park South Korea
Y. Nagai Japan
Tim C. de Wit relative to Rowan M. Thomson Canada Rowan M. Thomson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Rowan M. Thomson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim C. de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim C. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim C. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim C. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim C. de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim C. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim C. de Wit. The network helps show where Tim C. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim C. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim C. de Wit Line = papers co-authored together Tim C. de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000232
2 200489
3 200173
4 200266
5 200752
6 200750
7 200847
8 200646
9 200243
10 200932
11 201231
12 201724
13 201024
14 200624
15 200720
16 200520
17 201416
18 201215
19 201814
20 201013

About Tim C. de Wit

Tim C. de Wit is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Radiation, having authored 28 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (9 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (3 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (522 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (455 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (278 citations), Radiation (114 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (299 citations). Tim C. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include Eric Bergshoeff, Eduardo Eyras, M. de Roo, Sudhakar Panda, Antoine Van Proeyen, Sorin Cucu, Freek J. Beekman, Stefan Vandoren, J. Frank W. Nijsen and Steven Staelens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physics in Medicine and Biology, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and EJNMMI Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact