Physics in Medicine and Biology

16.6k papers and 482.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 16.6k papers published in Physics in Medicine and Biology in the last decades have received a total of 482.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Physics in Medicine and Biology usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (9.9k papers), Radiation (8.1k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (5.6k papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (5.5k papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5.3k papers) and Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (4.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physics in Medicine and Biology are Harald Paganetti, Steven L. Jacques, Camelia Gabriel, Antony Lomax, R W M Lau, Sami Gabriel, S Webb, Thomas Bortfeld, Jukka Sarvas and Simon Arridge.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physics in Medicine and Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physics in Medicine and Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physics in Medicine and Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Physics in Medicine and Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physics in Medicine and Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physics in Medicine and Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physics in Medicine and Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025