Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The challenge of abstract concepts.
2017288 citationsAnna M. Borghi, Ferdinand Binkofski et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Borghi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Borghi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Borghi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Borghi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Borghi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Borghi. The network helps show where Anna M. Borghi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M. Borghi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M. Borghi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M. Borghi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M. Borghi. Anna M. Borghi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Villani, Caterina, Anna M. Borghi, Luisa Lugli, & Marco Tullio Liuzza. (2018). Different Kinds of Abstract Concepts. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 235–252.2 indexed citations
Borghi, Anna M., et al.. (2008). Il corpo clandestino. IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia). 2(2). 341–346.
16.
Nicoletti, Roberto & Anna M. Borghi. (2007). IL controllo motorio. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna).4 indexed citations
17.
Borghi, Anna M., Claudia Bonfiglioli, Luisa Lugli, et al.. (2005). Visual hand primes and manipulable objects. BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca). 27(27). 332–337.13 indexed citations
18.
Borghi, Anna M., et al.. (2005). Objects and Affordances: An Artificial Life Simulation. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27).6 indexed citations
19.
Ferdinando, Andrea Di, Anna M. Borghi, & Domenico Parisi. (2002). The Role of Action in Object Categorization. The Florida AI Research Society. 138–142.1 indexed citations
20.
Borghi, Anna M., et al.. (2001). Taxonomic relations and cognitive economy in conceptual organization. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.