Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Richardson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Richardson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Richardson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Richardson. The network helps show where Daniel C. Richardson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel C. Richardson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel C. Richardson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel C. Richardson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel C. Richardson. Daniel C. Richardson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Göbel, Matthias, et al.. (2015). Social Eye Cue: How Knowledge Of Another Person's Attention Changes Your Own.. Cognitive Science.6 indexed citations
9.
Zimmermann, Jorina von & Daniel C. Richardson. (2015). Verbal Synchrony in Large Groups. Cognitive Science.5 indexed citations
10.
Pärnamets, Philip, Christian Balkenius, & Daniel C. Richardson. (2014). Modelling moral choice as a diffusion process dependent on visual fixations. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 36(36). 1132–1137.7 indexed citations
11.
Pärnamets, Philip, Petter Johansson, Christian Balkenius, et al.. (2013). Changing minds by tracking eyes: Dynamical systems, gaze and moral decisions. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 35(35). 1115–1120.4 indexed citations
Richardson, Daniel C., et al.. (2011). How do 100 people walk a tightrope together? An experiment in large scale joint action. Cognitive Science. 33(33).2 indexed citations
14.
Richardson, Daniel C., et al.. (2009). How to influence choice by monitoring gaze. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31).4 indexed citations
15.
Richardson, Daniel C. & Rick Dale. (2006). Figurative, spontaneous, interactive and potentially offensive: Three projects with rich visual and linguistic stimuli. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
16.
Dale, Rick & Daniel C. Richardson. (2006). Grounding Dialogue: Eye Movements Reveal the Coordination of Attention During Conversation and the Effects of Common Ground. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).3 indexed citations
17.
Richardson, Daniel C. & Rick Dale. (2004). Looking To Understand: The Coupling Between Speakers’ and Listeners’ Eye Movements and its Relationship to Discourse Comprehension. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).5 indexed citations
18.
Matlock, Teenie & Daniel C. Richardson. (2004). Do eye movements go with fictive motion. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).16 indexed citations
19.
Richardson, Daniel C., Michael J. Spivey, & J. T. Cheung. (2001). Motor representations in memory and mental models: Embodiment in cognition. UCL Discovery (University College London). 23(23).16 indexed citations
20.
Richardson, Daniel C., Michael J. Spivey, Shimon Edelman, & Adam Naples. (2001). "Language is Spatial": Experimental Evidence for Image Schemas of Concrete and Abstract Verbs. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23).32 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.