Anna L. Peterson
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Political Science and International Relations
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Co-authors
- Manuel A. VásquezKathleen Garces-FoleyPhilip WilliamsDara M. WaldCheryl L. MeehanZeeshan AliРена УпитисSusan K. Jacobson
- Topics
- Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (10 papers)Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSociology and Political ScienceNature and Landscape Conservation
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Anna L. Peterson
32 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Sociology and Political Science 160
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 37
- Political Science and International Relations 36
- Geography, Planning and Development 34
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 21
Countries citing papers authored by Anna L. Peterson
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna L. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna L. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna L. Peterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna L. Peterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna L. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna L. Peterson. The network helps show where Anna L. Peterson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna L. Peterson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna L. Peterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna L. Peterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna L. Peterson. Anna L. Peterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | The new evangelization in Latin American perspective | 7 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Anna L. Peterson
Anna L. Peterson is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (10 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (34 citations), Sociology and Political Science (160 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (37 citations). Anna L. Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Manuel A. Vásquez, Kathleen Garces-Foley, Philip Williams, Dara M. Wald, Cheryl L. Meehan, Zeeshan Ali, Рена Упитис, Susan K. Jacobson, Glenn D. Israel and Benjamin S. Lowe. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Hispanic American Historical Review and Agriculture and Human Values.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.