Anna Ilona Roberts
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental Biology top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Sam G. B. RobertsSarah‐Jane VickHannah M. Buchanan‐SmithCharles R. MenzelKlaus ZuberbühlerRobin DunbarLjubica Damjanovic
- Topics
- Primate Behavior and Ecology (21 papers)Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (17 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPolandSpain
In The Last Decade
Anna Ilona Roberts
20 papers receiving 452 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Social Psychology 397
- Developmental Biology 309
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 232
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 82
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Ilona Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Ilona Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Ilona Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Ilona Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Ilona Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Ilona Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Ilona Roberts. The network helps show where Anna Ilona Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Ilona Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Ilona Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Ilona Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Ilona Roberts. Anna Ilona Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 64 | |
| 19 | 64 | |
| 20 | 45 |
About Anna Ilona Roberts
Anna Ilona Roberts is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (21 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (17 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (309 citations), Social Psychology (397 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (232 citations). Anna Ilona Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Sam G. B. Roberts, Sarah‐Jane Vick, Hannah M. Buchanan‐Smith, Charles R. Menzel, Klaus Zuberbühler, Robin Dunbar and Ljubica Damjanovic. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.