Anna Gupta
- Public Administration top 1%
- Social Work Education and Practice 23
- Safety Research top 2%
- Child Welfare and Adoption 13
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child Abuse and Trauma 16
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Homelessness and Social Issues 22
- Health and Wellbeing Research 2
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Children's Rights and Participation 7
-
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 3
-
- Healthcare innovation and challenges 2
- Co-authors
- Brid FeatherstoneKate MorrisJoanne WarnerSusan W. WhiteJocelyn JonesSharon McMahonRobin SenGillian MacIntyre
- Journals
- The British Journal of Social Work (9 papers)Child & Family Social Work (4 papers)Social Work Education (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIsraelUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anna Gupta
44 papers receiving 551 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Public Administration 280
- Safety Research 162
- Clinical Psychology 298
- General Health Professions 326
- Sociology and Political Science 182
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Gupta
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Gupta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Gupta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Gupta. The network helps show where Anna Gupta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Anna Gupta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 11 | Punishing the Poor? Child Welfare and Protection under Neoliberalism | 2018 | 6 |
| 12 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 108 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 23 |
About Anna Gupta
Anna Gupta is a scholar working on Public Administration, Safety Research, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (23 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (22 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (16 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (13 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (7 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers) and Health and Wellbeing Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (280 citations), Safety Research (162 citations), Clinical Psychology (298 citations), General Health Professions (326 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (182 citations). Anna Gupta has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brid Featherstone, Kate Morris, Joanne Warner, Susan W. White, Jocelyn Jones, Sharon McMahon, Robin Sen, Gillian MacIntyre, Merja Laitinen and Marina Lalayants. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Social Work, Child & Family Social Work, Social Work Education, European Journal of Social Work and Qualitative Social Work.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.