Bert N. Bakker

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
41 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Bert N. Bakker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bert N. Bakker has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 17 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Bert N. Bakker's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (11 papers). Bert N. Bakker is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (11 papers). Bert N. Bakker collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Denmark. Bert N. Bakker's co-authors include Gijs Schumacher, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthijs Rooduijn, Kevin Arceneaux, Ariel Malka, Sara B. Hobolt, Catherine E. De Vries, Claes H. de Vreese, Mark J. Brandt and Martijn Schoonvelde and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Trends in Cognitive Sciences and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Bert N. Bakker

39 papers receiving 969 citations

Hit Papers

Crisis signaling: how Italy's coronavirus lockdown affect... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 20 40 60

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bert N. Bakker Netherlands 18 715 451 194 154 132 41 1.0k
Nathan P. Kalmoe United States 13 670 0.9× 441 1.0× 131 0.7× 240 1.6× 52 0.4× 32 924
Flávio Azevedo United Kingdom 16 710 1.0× 209 0.5× 206 1.1× 143 0.9× 57 0.4× 40 933
Tobias Stark Netherlands 19 807 1.1× 134 0.3× 298 1.5× 163 1.1× 74 0.6× 53 1.1k
Joanna Sterling United States 10 616 0.9× 138 0.3× 231 1.2× 238 1.5× 30 0.2× 11 882
Miriam Matthews United States 12 533 0.7× 96 0.2× 269 1.4× 74 0.5× 73 0.6× 60 792
Antoine Banks United States 13 848 1.2× 501 1.1× 127 0.7× 387 2.5× 30 0.2× 20 1.1k
Charles Crabtree United States 16 603 0.8× 308 0.7× 91 0.5× 90 0.6× 25 0.2× 72 850
Sean P. Wojcik United States 10 454 0.6× 84 0.2× 233 1.2× 111 0.7× 73 0.6× 13 708
C. Thi Nguyen United States 15 550 0.8× 115 0.3× 62 0.3× 112 0.7× 49 0.4× 28 982
Jerrold M. Post United States 20 1.0k 1.4× 287 0.6× 293 1.5× 42 0.3× 372 2.8× 77 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Bert N. Bakker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert N. Bakker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert N. Bakker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert N. Bakker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert N. Bakker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert N. Bakker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert N. Bakker. The network helps show where Bert N. Bakker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bert N. Bakker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bert N. Bakker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bert N. Bakker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bert N. Bakker. Bert N. Bakker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rooduijn, Matthijs, et al.. (2025). Loneliness is positively associated with populist radical right support. Social Science & Medicine. 366. 117676–117676. 2 indexed citations
2.
Skovsgaard, Morten, et al.. (2025). Affective Storytelling for Video News: Introducing and Testing Batman Affective Structure in the Age of Streaming. Journalism Studies. 26(9). 1108–1128. 1 indexed citations
3.
Schumacher, Gijs, et al.. (2025). Establishing the construct and predictive validity of brief measures of affective polarization. European Journal of Political Research. 64(4). 2146–2160.
4.
Bakker, Bert N. & Yphtach Lelkes. (2024). Putting the affect into affective polarisation. Cognition & Emotion. 38(4). 418–436. 11 indexed citations
5.
Hopp, Frederic R., et al.. (2024). The Dutch moral foundations stimulus database: An adaptation and validation of moral vignettes and sociomoral images in a Dutch sample. Judgment and Decision Making. 19. 2 indexed citations
6.
Schumacher, Gijs, et al.. (2024). Establishing the validity and robustness of facial electromyography measures for political science. Politics and the Life Sciences. 43(2). 1–18. 1 indexed citations
7.
Schumacher, Gijs, et al.. (2024). Replicating and Extending Soroka, Fournier, and Nir: Negative News Increases Arousal and Negative Affect. Media and Communication. 12. 2 indexed citations
8.
Bakker, Bert N., et al.. (2024). Tone in politics is not systematically related to macro trends, ideology, or experience. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 3241–3241. 4 indexed citations
9.
Brandt, Mark J. & Bert N. Bakker. (2022). The complicated but solvable threat–politics relationship. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 26(5). 368–370. 25 indexed citations
10.
Brandt, Mark J. & Bert N. Bakker. (2022). Threat-politics perceptions are intertwined with emotional processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 26(9). 733–734. 2 indexed citations
11.
Bakker, Bert N., Yphtach Lelkes, & Ariel Malka. (2021). Reconsidering the Link Between Self-Reported Personality Traits and Political Preferences. American Political Science Review. 115(4). 1482–1498. 49 indexed citations
12.
Vries, Catherine E. De, Bert N. Bakker, Sara B. Hobolt, & Kevin Arceneaux. (2021). Crisis signaling: how Italy's coronavirus lockdown affected incumbent support in other European countries. Political Science Research and Methods. 9(3). 451–467. 73 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Bakker, Bert N., et al.. (2020). Questionable and open research practices: attitudes and perceptions among quantitative communication researchers. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 6 indexed citations
14.
Malka, Ariel, et al.. (2020). Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies?. Perspectives on Politics. 20(3). 808–827. 29 indexed citations
15.
Vliegenthart, Rens, et al.. (2020). COVID-19 panel study in the Netherlands. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 5 indexed citations
16.
Bakker, Bert N., et al.. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour. 4(6). 613–621. 89 indexed citations
17.
Bakker, Bert N., et al.. (2020). Yikes! Are we disgusted by politicians?. Politics and the Life Sciences. 39(2). 135–153. 13 indexed citations
18.
Schoonvelde, Martijn, Anna Brosius, Gijs Schumacher, & Bert N. Bakker. (2019). Liberals lecture, conservatives communicate: Analyzing complexity and ideology in 381,609 political speeches. PLoS ONE. 14(2). e0208450–e0208450. 34 indexed citations
19.
Bakker, Bert N., Matthijs Rooduijn, & Gijs Schumacher. (2015). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research. 55(2). 302–320. 158 indexed citations
20.
Bakker, Bert N., David Nicolas Hopmann, & Mikael Persson. (2014). Personality traits and party identification over time. European Journal of Political Research. 54(2). 197–215. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026