Nicoleta Corbu

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 670 citations indexed

About

Nicoleta Corbu is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicoleta Corbu has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 670 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 23 papers in Communication and 9 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Nicoleta Corbu's work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (20 papers), Social Media and Politics (18 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (8 papers). Nicoleta Corbu is often cited by papers focused on Misinformation and Its Impacts (20 papers), Social Media and Politics (18 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (8 papers). Nicoleta Corbu collaborates with scholars based in Romania, Austria and Netherlands. Nicoleta Corbu's co-authors include Christian Schemer, Jörg Matthes, David Nicolas Hopmann, Claes H. de Vreese, James Stanyer, Peter Van Aelst, Ana Sofía Cardenal, Karolina Koç-Michalska, Agnieszka Stępińska and Laia Castro and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, New Media & Society and Information Communication & Society.

In The Last Decade

Nicoleta Corbu

39 papers receiving 641 citations

Hit Papers

Does a Crisis Change News Habits? A Comparative Study of ... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 40 80 120

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicoleta Corbu Romania 13 500 360 117 114 60 45 670
D.J. Flynn United States 7 738 1.5× 328 0.9× 144 1.2× 210 1.8× 41 0.7× 9 865
Esther Greussing Germany 10 504 1.0× 226 0.6× 91 0.8× 198 1.7× 32 0.5× 18 744
Ana Sofía Cardenal Spain 14 439 0.9× 458 1.3× 95 0.8× 117 1.0× 37 0.6× 26 695
Václav Štětka United Kingdom 17 508 1.0× 577 1.6× 83 0.7× 172 1.5× 48 0.8× 52 877
Danielle K. Brown United States 16 482 1.0× 616 1.7× 87 0.7× 104 0.9× 73 1.2× 32 890
Niels G. Mede Switzerland 11 463 0.9× 160 0.4× 69 0.6× 109 1.0× 30 0.5× 30 588
Katherine Clayton United States 8 556 1.1× 281 0.8× 163 1.4× 204 1.8× 47 0.8× 21 709
Fabienne Lind Austria 13 447 0.9× 308 0.9× 125 1.1× 166 1.5× 40 0.7× 24 781
Axel Westerwick United States 12 381 0.8× 265 0.7× 72 0.6× 60 0.5× 53 0.9× 19 534
Laia Castro Switzerland 13 605 1.2× 748 2.1× 93 0.8× 179 1.6× 44 0.7× 22 970

Countries citing papers authored by Nicoleta Corbu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicoleta Corbu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicoleta Corbu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicoleta Corbu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicoleta Corbu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicoleta Corbu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicoleta Corbu. The network helps show where Nicoleta Corbu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicoleta Corbu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicoleta Corbu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicoleta Corbu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicoleta Corbu. Nicoleta Corbu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Corbu, Nicoleta, James Stanyer, Jesper Strömbäck, et al.. (2025). Illusory Superiority About Misinformation Detection and Its Relationship to Knowledge and Fact-Checking Intentions: Evidence from 18 Countries. Mass Communication & Society. 29(1). 101–120.
2.
Erkel, Patrick F. A. van, Peter Van Aelst, Claes H. de Vreese, et al.. (2024). When are Fact-Checks Effective? An Experimental Study on the Inclusion of the Misinformation Source and the Source of Fact-Checks in 16 European Countries. Mass Communication & Society. 27(5). 851–876. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hameleers, Michael, Claes H. de Vreese, Toril Aalberg, et al.. (2024). Why do Citizens Choose to Read Fact-Checks in the Context of the Russian War in Ukraine? The Role of Directional and Accuracy Motivations in Nineteen Democracies. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 30(3). 679–704. 2 indexed citations
4.
Frau‐Meigs, Divina & Nicoleta Corbu. (2024). Disinformation Debunked. 2 indexed citations
5.
Corbu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2023). Patterns of News Consumption in a High-Choice Media Environment. 4 indexed citations
6.
Matthes, Jörg, Nicoleta Corbu, Yannis Theocharis, et al.. (2022). Perceived prevalence of misinformation fuels worries about COVID-19: a cross-country, multi-method investigation. Information Communication & Society. 26(16). 3133–3156. 17 indexed citations
7.
Zoizner, Alon, Tamir Sheafer, Laia Castro, et al.. (2022). The Effects of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Selective Exposure: Evidence from 17 Countries. Political Communication. 39(5). 674–696. 9 indexed citations
8.
Corbu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2022). Predictors of Engagement on Social Media and Instant Messaging Platforms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Romania. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 24(3). 7–23. 2 indexed citations
10.
Aelst, Peter Van, Laia Castro, Václav Štětka, et al.. (2021). Does a Crisis Change News Habits? A Comparative Study of the Effects of COVID-19 on News Media Use in 17 European Countries. Digital Journalism. 9(9). 1208–1238. 129 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Theocharis, Yannis, Ana Sofía Cardenal, Toril Aalberg, et al.. (2021). Does the platform matter? Social media and COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in 17 countries. New Media & Society. 25(12). 3412–3437. 77 indexed citations
12.
Castro, Laia, Jesper Strömbäck, Frank Esser, et al.. (2021). Navigating High-Choice European Political Information Environments: a Comparative Analysis of News User Profiles and Political Knowledge. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 27(4). 827–859. 39 indexed citations
13.
14.
Corbu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2020). Patterns of digital behaviour on instant messaging platforms. WhatsApp uses among young people from Romania. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
15.
Hameleers, Michael, Desirée Schmuck, Anne Schulz, et al.. (2020). The Effects of Populist Identity Framing on Populist Attitudes Across Europe: Evidence From a 15-Country Comparative Experiment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 33(3). 491–510. 29 indexed citations
16.
Bos, L., Christian Schemer, Nicoleta Corbu, et al.. (2019). The effects of populism as a social identity frame on persuasion and mobilisation: Evidence from a 15‐country experiment. European Journal of Political Research. 59(1). 3–24. 92 indexed citations
17.
Corbu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2018). Fake News and the Third-Person Effect: They are More Influenced than Me and You. 11(3(32)). 5–23. 47 indexed citations
18.
Corbu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2017). Third-person Perception and Its Predictors in the Age of Facebook. 10(2 (28)). 18–36. 8 indexed citations
19.
Corbu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2015). Moderators of Framing Effects on Political Attitudes: Is Source Credibility Worth Investigating?. 17(2). 155–177. 3 indexed citations
20.
Corbu, Nicoleta, et al.. (2013). PRIMING AND FRAMING EFFECTS IN THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE 2009 ROMANIAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026