Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs

14 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Research and Theory 22
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 30
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • Leadership and Management 9
  • Health 49
Replace María del Carmen Malagón-Aguilera with:
María del Carmen Malagón-Aguilera Spain
Cristina Bosch‐Farré Spain
Kay Shannon New Zealand
Aída Maria de Oliveira Cruz Mendes Portugal
Sienna Caspar Canada
Yafa Haron Israel
Montserrat Puig Llobet Spain
Simona Hvalič‐Touzery Slovenia
Azusa Arimoto Japan
Kathleen Lechasseur Canada
Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs relative to María del Carmen Malagón-Aguilera Spain María del Carmen Malagón-Aguilera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
María del Carmen Malagón-Aguilera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs. The network helps show where Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs Line = papers co-authored together Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 202056
2 201842
3 201935
4 201626
5 202021
6 201816
7 201915
8 201613
9 201213
10 201613
11 202013
12 20209
13 20215
14 20222
15 20240

About Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs

Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Physiology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 15 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (2 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (22 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (30 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), Leadership and Management (9 citations) and Health (49 citations). Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Cristina Bosch‐Farré, María del Carmen Malagón-Aguilera, Dolors Juvinyà Canal, Concepció Fuentes‐Pumarola, David Ballester Ferrando, Rosa Suñer Soler, Carme Bertran‐Noguer, Rosario Fernández‐Peña, Marta Raurell‐Torredà and Josep Garre‐Olmo. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Nurse Education Today, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, BMC Health Services Research and Journal of Professional Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact