William Keith

597 citations
36 papers · 374 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William Keith

28 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

William Keith
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Philosophy 164
  • Literature and Literary Theory 137
  • Communication 70
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
  • Language and Linguistics 30
Replace Steven Mailloux with:
Steven Mailloux United States
John Poulakos United States
Debra Hawhee United States
Joshua Gunn United States
Eugene Garver United States
Donald Lateiner United States
Bruce E. Gronbeck United States
S. Michael Halloran United States
J. Robert Cox United States
Cara A. Finnegan United States
William Keith relative to Steven Mailloux United States Steven Mailloux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Steven Mailloux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Keith. The network helps show where William Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside William Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Keith Line = papers co-authored together William Keith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Rhetorical Hermeneutics: Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science
1997116
2
Democracy as Discussion: Civic Education and the American Forum Movement
200745
3 201438
4 201128
5
The Essential Guide to Rhetoric
200822
6 200817
7 200013
8 200812
9 201210
10 201110
11 20029
12 20087
13 19886
14 20115
15 19925
16 20025
17 20165
18 20144
19 19942
20 19932

About William Keith

William Keith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (10 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (10 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (164 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (137 citations), Communication (70 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (43 citations) and Language and Linguistics (30 citations). William Keith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and France. Frequent co-authors include Alan G. Gross, David Beard, Sang‐Yeon Kim, S. Scott Graham, Kenneth S. Zagacki, Julien Talpin, Jane Mansbridge, Graham Smith, Steven Shapin and James T. Kloppenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Argumentation, Quarterly Journal of Speech, Rhetoric Society Quarterly and Philosophy and Rhetoric.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact