Anke Versluis

1.2k citations
45 papers · 657 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anke Versluis

40 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers

Anke Versluis
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Applied Psychology 168
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 150
  • General Health Professions 249
  • Health Information Management 33
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 26
Replace Mike Denis with:
Mike Denis United Kingdom
Jessica Sousa United States
Connie Chen United States
Susan W. Buchholz United States
Meghan Mattos United States
Christoph Dockweiler Germany
Thierry Provencher Canada
Pete Wegier Canada
Melanie T. Gentry United States
João Mazzoncini de Azevedo Marques Brazil
Anke Versluis relative to Mike Denis United Kingdom Mike Denis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Mike Denis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anke Versluis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Versluis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Versluis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Versluis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Versluis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Versluis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Versluis. The network helps show where Anke Versluis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anke Versluis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anke Versluis Line = papers co-authored together Anke Versluis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016117
2 202173
3 202152
4 201738
5 202034
6 202232
7 201827
8 202124
9 202023
10 201723
11 202022
12 202021
13 201817
14 202016
15 202213
16 202113
17 202013
18 201710
19 202110
20 202110

About Anke Versluis

Anke Versluis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Physiology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (18 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (10 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (5 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (168 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (150 citations), General Health Professions (249 citations), Health Information Management (33 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (26 citations). Anke Versluis has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Bart Verkuil, J. F. Brosschot, Niels H. Chavannes, Esther Talboom-Kamp, Philip Spinhoven, Marise J. Kasteleyn, Jiska J Aardoom, Julian F. Thayer, Rianne van der Kleij and Anke Persoon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, European Journal of General Practice, Digital Health, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Stress and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact