Connie Chen

745 citations
30 papers · 475 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Connie Chen

24 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Connie Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Applied Psychology 136
  • General Health Professions 194
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
  • Health Information Management 17
Replace Anke Versluis with:
Anke Versluis Netherlands
Christoph Dockweiler Germany
Victor P. Cornet United States
Pete Wegier Canada
Chaitali Sinha Canada
José Tomás Prieto United States
Karina Karolina De Santis Germany
Sonia Garcia Gonzalez-Moral United Kingdom
Pilar Marqués‐Sánchez Spain
Tara McCurdie Australia
Connie Chen relative to Anke Versluis Netherlands Anke Versluis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Anke Versluis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Connie Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Connie Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Connie Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connie Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Connie Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Connie Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Connie Chen. The network helps show where Connie Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Connie Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Connie Chen Line = papers co-authored together Connie Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201277
2 201760
3 200755
4 202042
5 201434
6 201929
7 202027
8 201227
9 202021
10 201715
11 202214
12 202014
13 202113
14 20218
15 20107
16 20216
17 20226
18 20225
19 20004
20 20234

About Connie Chen

Connie Chen is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (14 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (136 citations), General Health Professions (194 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations) and Health Information Management (17 citations). Connie Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Anita Lungu, Ida Sim, J. Nwando Olayiwola, Joshua Selsky, Richard L. Kravitz, Julia E. Hoffman, Rita F. Redberg, Sanket S. Dhruva, David Haddad and Yan Leykin. Their work appears in journals such as Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Value in Health and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact