Anke Piepenbrink

499 citations
14 papers · 320 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anke Piepenbrink

12 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Anke Piepenbrink
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • General Social Sciences 32
  • Accounting 83
  • Strategy and Management 72
  • Management Information Systems 41
  • Management Science and Operations Research 51
Replace Helena Haapio with:
Helena Haapio Finland
Manish Dadhich India
Egi Arvian Firmansyah Indonesia
Alexander Lahmann Germany
Kevin Kelly United States
Claudio Teodori Italy
Chunmian Ge China
Zurina Shafii Malaysia
Vishal Narayan United States
Björn Wellenius Chile
Anke Piepenbrink relative to Helena Haapio Finland Helena Haapio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Helena Haapio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anke Piepenbrink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Piepenbrink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Piepenbrink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Piepenbrink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Piepenbrink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Piepenbrink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Piepenbrink. The network helps show where Anke Piepenbrink may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Anke Piepenbrink, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anke Piepenbrink Line = papers co-authored together Anke Piepenbrink links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 202186
2 202139
3 201137
4 202332
5 201728
6 201424
7 201522
8 201920
9 201318
10 20237
11 20166
12
Methodological Advances in the Analysis of Bipartite Networks: An Illustration Using Board Interlocks in Indian Firms
20131
13 20120
14 20170

About Anke Piepenbrink

Anke Piepenbrink is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, General Social Sciences, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational and Text Analysis Methods (5 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Stock Market Forecasting Methods (3 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers), AI in Service Interactions (2 papers) and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (32 citations), Accounting (83 citations), Strategy and Management (72 citations), Management Information Systems (41 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (51 citations). Anke Piepenbrink has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Azerbaijan. Frequent co-authors include Michael Dowling, Saqib Aziz, Helmi Hammami, Ajai Gaur, Jbid Arsenyan, Farok J. Contractor, Christos Alexakis, John Cantwell and Agata Mirowska. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Business Studies, Scientometrics, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, International Review of Economics & Finance and Organizational Research Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact