Angelo Di Gregorio
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angelo Di Gregorio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angelo Di Gregorio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angelo Di Gregorio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angelo Di Gregorio. Angelo Di Gregorio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Angelo Di Gregorio
14 papers receiving 256 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Angelo Di Gregorio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angelo Di Gregorio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angelo Di Gregorio. The network helps show where Angelo Di Gregorio may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Angelo Di Gregorio
This map shows the geographic impact of Angelo Di Gregorio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angelo Di Gregorio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angelo Di Gregorio more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.