Angela Williams
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Co-authors
- Cathy TaylorA. B. G. LansdownPaula McGeeFiona MurphyAndrew Carson‐StevensAled JonesC V ProwseT. L. John
- Topics
- Emotional Labor in Professions (5 papers)Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers)Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Angela Williams
21 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- General Health Professions 167
- Sociology and Political Science 89
- Clinical Psychology 70
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 69
- Research and Theory 60
Countries citing papers authored by Angela Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Angela Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angela Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angela Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angela Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angela Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angela Williams. The network helps show where Angela Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angela Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angela Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angela Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angela Williams. Angela Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | Nursing models and contemporary nursing 2: can they raise standards of care? | 4 |
| 8 | Nursing models and contemporary nursing 1: their development, uses and limitations. | 12 |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | Bacterial resistance to silver-based antibiotics. | 16 |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 84 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | The invisible image--a tutorial on photography with invisible radiation, Part 3: Reflected infrared photography. | 5 |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Angela Williams
Angela Williams is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Public Administration, having authored 22 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotional Labor in Professions (5 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers) and Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (60 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (35 citations). Angela Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Cathy Taylor, A. B. G. Lansdown, Paula McGee, Fiona Murphy, Andrew Carson‐Stevens, Aled Jones, C V Prowse, T. L. John, Talat Mushtaq and Suma Uday. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.