Andrew Scull
- General Psychology top 1%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology 10
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 50
- History top 0.05%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 19
- History of Medicine Studies 4
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 26
- Neurology top 5%
- Neurology and Historical Studies 16
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 6
-
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 3
- Co-authors
- Steven SpitzerRoger CooterStanley CohenJudith M. HughesGeorge K. BehlmerMichael S. GoldsteinJohn AlexanderSteven Lukes
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (12 papers)The American Historical Review (5 papers)Social Problems (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Andrew Scull
114 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- General Psychology 102
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- History 504
- Philosophy 478
- Neurology 216
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Scull
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Scull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Scull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Scull more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Scull
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Scull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Scull. The network helps show where Andrew Scull may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Scull, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 11 | Los endebles cimientos del monumento foucaultiano | 2008 | 1 |
| 12 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 13 | The end of Freud | 1998 | 1 |
| 14 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 17 | The clitoridectomy craze. | 1986 | 9 |
| 18 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 19 | A brilliant career? John Conolly and Victorian psychiatry. | 1984 | 4 |
| 20 | 1983 | 5 |
About Andrew Scull
Andrew Scull is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology, History, Philosophy and Neurology, having authored 121 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (50 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (26 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (19 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (16 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (10 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), History of Medicine Studies (4 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (102 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), History (504 citations), Philosophy (478 citations) and Neurology (216 citations). Andrew Scull has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven Spitzer, Roger Cooter, Stanley Cohen, Judith M. Hughes, George K. Behlmer, Michael S. Goldstein, John Alexander, Steven Lukes, Robert Reiner and Michael Donnelly. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review, Social Problems, Medical History and British Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.