Andrew S. Bates

3.0k citations
47 papers · 2.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew S. Bates

41 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Andrew S. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.9k
  • Neurology 254
  • Genetics 158
  • Surgery 454
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 157
Replace Renato Cesare Cozzi with:
Renato Cesare Cozzi Italy
Amir Hekmat Hamrahian United States
Rama Walia India
Antônio Ribeiro‐Oliveira Brazil
Weiwei Zhou China
Lewis S. Blevins United States
Qiu‐Ting Dong China
Raja Padidela United Kingdom
Maria Kołtowska‐Häggström Sweden
John A. Scarlett United States
Andrew S. Bates relative to Renato Cesare Cozzi Italy Renato Cesare Cozzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Renato Cesare Cozzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew S. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew S. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew S. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew S. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew S. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew S. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew S. Bates. The network helps show where Andrew S. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew S. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew S. Bates Line = papers co-authored together Andrew S. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993430
2 1996396
3 2010319
4 2004299
5 2002178
6 1997160
7 199996
8 199571
9 199570
10 200961
11 201957
12 199553
13 201337
14 200236
15 201333
16 202132
17 202129
18 200927
19 202027
20 202119

About Andrew S. Bates

Andrew S. Bates is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Oncology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (13 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (9 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (5 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.9k citations), Neurology (254 citations), Genetics (158 citations), Surgery (454 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (157 citations). Andrew S. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. N. Clayton, William van’t Hoff, Peter J.H. Jones, Paul M. Stewart, Jefferson Michael Jones, Michael C. Sheppard, John Ayuk, Richard N. Clayton, Geoff Holder and Mark Sherlock. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, BMJ Open, Clinical Endocrinology, Journal of the Intensive Care Society and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact