Anna Campbell

4.8k citations
58 papers · 2.4k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Campbell

56 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Anna Campbell
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Oncology 1.6k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 872
  • Applied Psychology 127
  • Physiology 400
  • Clinical Psychology 298
Replace J.R.J. de Leeuw with:
J.R.J. de Leeuw Netherlands
Julie Midtgaard Denmark
Rebecca A. Shelby United States
Marianne Ahlner‐Elmqvist Sweden
Jeff K. Vallance Canada
Margaret Bevans United States
Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc United States
Melanie R. Keats Canada
Katherine R. Sterba United States
Teresa L. Deshields United States
Anna Campbell relative to J.R.J. de Leeuw Netherlands J.R.J. de Leeuw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
J.R.J. de Leeuw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Campbell. The network helps show where Anna Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Campbell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Campbell Line = papers co-authored together Anna Campbell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007316
2 2009218
3 2011180
4 2004165
5 2010134
6 2011107
7 2006107
8 2013102
9 2014100
10 201396
11 201286
12 201267
13 202064
14 202056
15 201250
16 200041
17 202138
18 201737
19 201435
20 202230

About Anna Campbell

Anna Campbell is a scholar working on Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Dentistry, Pharmacy and Applied Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (35 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (19 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (10 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (6 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (5 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (5 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (4 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.6k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (872 citations), Applied Psychology (127 citations), Physiology (400 citations) and Clinical Psychology (298 citations). Anna Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Heather A. Hausenblas, Nanette Mutrie, Nora Kearney, Jackie Gracey, Janine Blaney, Diana Ritchie, A Lowe-Strong, Fiona Whyte, Carol Emslie and Jane Rankin. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Cancer, Supportive Care in Cancer, Health Education Research and JNCI Monographs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026