This map shows the geographic impact of John Jay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Jay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Jay more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Jay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Jay. The network helps show where John Jay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Jay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Jay.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Jay based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Jay. John Jay is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jay, John. (2018). A Catalogue of the Shells, Arranged According to the Lamarckian System: Together With Descriptions of New or Rare Species.
7.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, & John Jay. (2017). The Federalist Papers. Yale University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
8.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, John Jay, & Edward G. Bourne. (2016). The Federalist: A Commentary on the Constitution of the United States. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).21 indexed citations
9.
Sokoloff, Natalie J., et al.. (2013). Systemic Barriers to Higher Education: How Colleges Respond to Applicants with Criminal Records in Maryland 1.10 indexed citations
10.
Morrow, John H., et al.. (2011). Narrative of the Expedition of an American Squadron to the China Seas and Japan.4 indexed citations
11.
Jay, John, et al.. (2010). The Fisheries Dispute.
12.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, John Jay, & Edward Mead Earle. (2010). The Federalist: A Commentary On the Constitution of the United States, Being a Collection of Essays Written in Support of the Constitution Agreed Upon September 17, 1787, by the Federal Convention. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
13.
Hamilton, Alexander, et al.. (2009). Federalist on the New Constitution Written in 1788. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).4 indexed citations
14.
Atran, Scott & John Jay. (2006). SACRED VALUES, TERRORISM, AND THE LIMITS OF RATIONAL CHOICE.2 indexed citations
15.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, John Jay, & Jack N. Rakove. (2003). The Federalist : the essential essays.2 indexed citations
16.
Patel, Aniruddh D., John R. Iversen, & John Jay. (2003). Acoustic and Perceptual Comparison of Speech and Drum Sounds in the North Indian Tabla Tradition: An Empirical Study of Sound Symbolism.18 indexed citations
17.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, John Jay, & Terence Ball. (2003). The Federalist: With Letters of Brutus. Medical Entomology and Zoology.43 indexed citations
18.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, & John Jay. (1987). The Federalist, or, The new Constitution. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).28 indexed citations
19.
Hamilton, Alexander, Ralph H. Gabriel, James Madison, & John Jay. (1966). On the American constitution : selections from the Federalist papers, Hamilton, Madison and Jay. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
20.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, John Jay, John Stuart Mill, & Mortimer J. Adler. (1952). American state papers . The federalist . On liberty ; Representative government ; Utilitarianism.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.