Andrew Olendzki
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sara W. LazarDavid R. VagoCatherine E. KerrKieran C. R. FoxNicholas T. Van DamMarieke K. van VugtLaura SchmalzlWilloughby B. Britton
- Topics
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper)Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Andrew Olendzki
4 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 483
- Social Psychology 355
- Cognitive Neuroscience 247
- Applied Psychology 148
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Olendzki
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Olendzki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Olendzki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Olendzki more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Olendzki
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Olendzki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Olendzki. The network helps show where Andrew Olendzki may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Olendzki
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Olendzki. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Olendzki based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Olendzki. Andrew Olendzki is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditationbreakdown → | 950 |
| 2 | Moving Beyond Mindfulness: Defining Equanimity as an Outcome Measure in Meditation and Contemplative Researchbreakdown → | 315 |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | The Roots of Mindfulness. | 32 |
| 5 | 0 |
About Andrew Olendzki
Andrew Olendzki is a scholar working on Religious studies, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (483 citations) and Applied Psychology (148 citations). Andrew Olendzki has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sara W. Lazar, David R. Vago, Catherine E. Kerr, Kieran C. R. Fox, Nicholas T. Van Dam, Marieke K. van Vugt, Laura Schmalzl, Willoughby B. Britton, David E. Meyer and Julie A. Brefczynski‐Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives on Psychological Science, Mindfulness and Contemporary Buddhism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.