Nicholas T. Van Dam
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mitch EarleywinePaul GrossmanJin FanSean C. SheppardJohn P. ForsythAshley BordersSharon Danoff‐BurgWilloughby B. Britton
- Topics
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (19 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (18 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nicholas T. Van Dam
52 papers receiving 4.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Clinical Psychology 2.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Social Psychology 944
- Psychiatry and Mental health 444
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas T. Van Dam
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas T. Van Dam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas T. Van Dam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas T. Van Dam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas T. Van Dam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas T. Van Dam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas T. Van Dam. The network helps show where Nicholas T. Van Dam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas T. Van Dam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas T. Van Dam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas T. Van Dam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas T. Van Dam. Nicholas T. Van Dam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 149 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 66 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 146 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Nicholas T. Van Dam
Nicholas T. Van Dam is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 57 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (19 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (18 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (172 citations). Nicholas T. Van Dam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mitch Earleywine, Paul Grossman, Jin Fan, Sean C. Sheppard, John P. Forsyth, Ashley Borders, Sharon Danoff‐Burg, Willoughby B. Britton, Catherine E. Kerr and David R. Vago. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.