Catherine E. Kerr
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- Sara W. LazarTed J. KaptchukChristopher I. MooreLisa ConboyEric JacobsonRoger B. DavisAnthony LemboRachel H. Wasserman
- Topics
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect (17 papers)Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (16 papers)Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Catherine E. Kerr
51 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Clinical Psychology 2.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
- Complementary and alternative medicine 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine E. Kerr
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine E. Kerr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine E. Kerr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine E. Kerr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine E. Kerr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine E. Kerr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine E. Kerr. The network helps show where Catherine E. Kerr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine E. Kerr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine E. Kerr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine E. Kerr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine E. Kerr. Catherine E. Kerr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | Interoception, contemplative practice, and healthbreakdown → | 395 |
| 4 | 211 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | 132 | |
| 7 | 98 | |
| 8 | 287 | |
| 9 | 96 | |
| 10 | 208 | |
| 11 | 145 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 240 |
About Catherine E. Kerr
Catherine E. Kerr is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 54 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (17 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (16 papers) and Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (1.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.8k citations) and Clinical Psychology (2.9k citations). Catherine E. Kerr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sara W. Lazar, Ted J. Kaptchuk, Christopher I. Moore, Lisa Conboy, Eric Jacobson, Roger B. Davis, Anthony Lembo, Rachel H. Wasserman, Irving Kirsch and David R. Vago. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.