Rachel Grob

1.0k total citations
51 papers, 714 citations indexed

About

Rachel Grob is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Grob has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 714 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Rachel Grob's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (16 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (13 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (11 papers). Rachel Grob is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (16 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (13 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (11 papers). Rachel Grob collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Rachel Grob's co-authors include Mark Schlesinger, Dale Shaller, Melissa L. Finucane, Jennifer Cerully, Steven C. Martino, Andrew M. Parker, Lise Rybowski, Marian Jarlenski, Sarah E. Gollust and Colleen L. Barry and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Grob

49 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Grob United States 16 424 118 112 94 81 51 714
Patricia Ward United Kingdom 5 465 1.1× 175 1.5× 67 0.6× 75 0.8× 50 0.6× 10 716
Anna P. Goddu United States 9 424 1.0× 157 1.3× 79 0.7× 44 0.5× 102 1.3× 11 813
Ardis Davis United States 14 527 1.2× 279 2.4× 143 1.3× 40 0.4× 26 0.3× 56 853
Heather Goodare United Kingdom 9 550 1.3× 206 1.7× 79 0.7× 73 0.8× 89 1.1× 14 799
Hailey Miller United States 12 229 0.5× 228 1.9× 57 0.5× 27 0.3× 100 1.2× 48 694
Diane Powers United States 16 382 0.9× 79 0.7× 105 0.9× 107 1.1× 101 1.2× 24 848
Lisbeth Sachs Sweden 20 296 0.7× 169 1.4× 49 0.4× 88 0.9× 189 2.3× 55 908
Suzanne Schrandt United States 8 394 0.9× 136 1.2× 84 0.8× 48 0.5× 33 0.4× 14 692
Marc Taylor United Kingdom 4 306 0.7× 206 1.7× 88 0.8× 37 0.4× 147 1.8× 4 677
Jennifer Bennett United States 7 314 0.7× 148 1.3× 37 0.3× 81 0.9× 94 1.2× 18 717

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Grob

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Grob's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Grob with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Grob more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Grob

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Grob. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Grob. The network helps show where Rachel Grob may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Grob

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Grob. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Grob based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Grob. Rachel Grob is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
3.
Grob, Rachel, et al.. (2024). “Nothing Is More Powerful than Words:” How Patient Experience Narratives Enable Improvement. Quality Management in Health Care. 33(3). 149–159. 2 indexed citations
4.
Martino, Steven C., Kerry Reynolds, Rachel Grob, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of a protocol for eliciting narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experiences of care. Health Services Research. 58(2). 271–281. 4 indexed citations
5.
Schlesinger, Mark & Rachel Grob. (2023). When Mistakes Multiply: How Inadequate Responses to Medical Mishaps Erode Trust in American Medicine. The Hastings Center Report. 53(S2). S22–S32. 4 indexed citations
6.
Dowrick, Anna, et al.. (2023). Navigating responsible bio-political citizenship: Cross-country comparison of stigma in Covid-19 illness narratives in Germany, Japan, the UK and the USA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 100291–100291. 3 indexed citations
7.
Grob, Rachel, et al.. (2023). Leveraging Patients’ Creative Ideas for Innovation in Health Care. Milbank Quarterly. 102(1). 233–269. 4 indexed citations
8.
Castellanos, Marcelo Eduardo Pfeiffer, Anna Dowrick, Ana Cláudia Camargo Gonçalves Germani, et al.. (2023). Talking about inequities: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 narratives in the UK, US, and Brazil. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 100277–100277. 3 indexed citations
9.
MacLean, Alice, Kate Hunt, Ashley Brown, et al.. (2022). Negotiation of collective and individual candidacy for long Covid healthcare in the early phases of the Covid-19 pandemic: Validated, diverted and rejected candidacy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 100207–100207. 17 indexed citations
10.
Pandhi, Nancy, et al.. (2022). Developing catalyst films of health experiences: an analysis of a robust multi-stakeholder involvement journey. Research Involvement and Engagement. 8(1). 34–34. 2 indexed citations
11.
Grob, Rachel, Mark Schlesinger, Naomi S. Bardach, et al.. (2019). What Words Convey: The Potential for Patient Narratives to Inform Quality Improvement. Milbank Quarterly. 97(1). 176–227. 44 indexed citations
12.
Pandhi, Nancy, et al.. (2019). Broadening Medical Students’ Exposure to the Range of Illness Experiences: A Pilot Curriculum Focused on Depression Education. Academic Medicine. 95(1). 72–76. 6 indexed citations
13.
Cerully, Jennifer, Andrew M. Parker, Lise Rybowski, et al.. (2018). Improving Patients’ Choice of Clinician by Including Roll-up Measures in Public Healthcare Quality Reports: an Online Experiment. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(2). 243–249. 3 indexed citations
14.
Schlesinger, Mark & Rachel Grob. (2017). Treating, Fast and Slow: Americans’ Understanding of and Responses to Low‐Value Care. Milbank Quarterly. 95(1). 70–116. 36 indexed citations
15.
Cerully, Jennifer, Steven C. Martino, Lise Rybowski, et al.. (2017). Using "roll-up" measures in healthcare quality reports: perspectives of report sponsors and national alliances.. PubMed. 23(6). e202–e207. 2 indexed citations
16.
Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick, Kathy Hirsh‐Pasek, Rachel Grob, & Mark Schlesinger. (2017). “Oh, the Places You'll Go” by Bringing Developmental Science Into the World!. Child Development. 88(5). 1403–1408. 11 indexed citations
17.
Grob, Rachel, Mark Schlesinger, Amy Pace, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, & Kathy Hirsh‐Pasek. (2017). Playing With Ideas: Evaluating the Impact of the Ultimate Block Party, a Collective Experiential Intervention to Enrich Perceptions of Play. Child Development. 88(5). 1419–1434. 18 indexed citations
18.
Schlesinger, Mark, Rachel Grob, Dale Shaller, et al.. (2015). Taking Patients’ Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science. New England Journal of Medicine. 373(7). 675–679. 87 indexed citations
19.
Grob, Rachel. (2012). The Heart of Patient-Centered Care. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law. 38(2). 457–465. 20 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026