Andrew M. Herbert
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- G. Keith HumphreySteven C. DakinJocelyn FaubertZaira CattaneoJuha SilvantoEsa M. RantanenJeff B. PelzSilvia Bona
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers)Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesJournal of Experimental Psychology GeneralVision Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew M. Herbert
31 papers receiving 750 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Cognitive Neuroscience 571
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 182
- Social Psychology 157
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 74
- Clinical Psychology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew M. Herbert
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew M. Herbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew M. Herbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew M. Herbert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew M. Herbert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew M. Herbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew M. Herbert. The network helps show where Andrew M. Herbert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew M. Herbert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew M. Herbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew M. Herbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew M. Herbert. Andrew M. Herbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 76 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 90 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 77 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Andrew M. Herbert
Andrew M. Herbert is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 32 papers that have together received 778 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (571 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (182 citations) and Social Psychology (157 citations). Andrew M. Herbert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G. Keith Humphrey, Steven C. Dakin, Jocelyn Faubert, Zaira Cattaneo, Juha Silvanto, Esa M. Rantanen, Jeff B. Pelz, Silvia Bona, Rick Gurnsey and Daphne L. McCulloch. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Vision Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.