Andrew M. Herbert

1.0k total citations
32 papers, 778 citations indexed

About

Andrew M. Herbert is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew M. Herbert has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 778 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Andrew M. Herbert's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers). Andrew M. Herbert is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers). Andrew M. Herbert collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Andrew M. Herbert's co-authors include G. Keith Humphrey, Steven C. Dakin, Jocelyn Faubert, Zaira Cattaneo, Juha Silvanto, Esa M. Rantanen, Jeff B. Pelz, Silvia Bona, Rick Gurnsey and Daphne L. McCulloch and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Andrew M. Herbert

31 papers receiving 750 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew M. Herbert United States 15 571 182 157 74 36 32 778
Kai Hamburger Germany 17 367 0.6× 135 0.7× 129 0.8× 66 0.9× 13 0.4× 52 706
Charles A. Heywood United Kingdom 20 810 1.4× 216 1.2× 185 1.2× 61 0.8× 12 0.3× 37 976
Katharine A. Tillman United States 8 795 1.4× 209 1.1× 81 0.5× 134 1.8× 12 0.3× 18 1.0k
A. David Ing United States 13 586 1.0× 161 0.9× 142 0.9× 41 0.6× 28 0.8× 17 890
Kenith V. Sobel United States 11 582 1.0× 217 1.2× 95 0.6× 52 0.7× 7 0.2× 25 670
Anirvan S. Nandy United States 12 656 1.1× 143 0.8× 122 0.8× 73 1.0× 65 1.8× 29 844
Yaïr Pinto Netherlands 15 624 1.1× 154 0.8× 135 0.9× 67 0.9× 26 0.7× 31 758
Alexis D. J. Makin United Kingdom 22 1.3k 2.2× 399 2.2× 358 2.3× 88 1.2× 62 1.7× 75 1.4k
Rebecca L. Achtman United States 8 505 0.9× 190 1.0× 58 0.4× 29 0.4× 12 0.3× 10 723
Boris Crassini Australia 15 566 1.0× 150 0.8× 201 1.3× 45 0.6× 12 0.3× 49 743

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew M. Herbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew M. Herbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew M. Herbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew M. Herbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew M. Herbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew M. Herbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew M. Herbert. The network helps show where Andrew M. Herbert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew M. Herbert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew M. Herbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew M. Herbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew M. Herbert. Andrew M. Herbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Herbert, Andrew M., et al.. (2021). Exploring CNN features in the context of adversarial robustness and human perception. 37. 42–42. 1 indexed citations
2.
Sutton, Tina M., et al.. (2019). Valence, arousal, and dominance ratings for facial stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72(8). 2046–2055. 25 indexed citations
3.
Cattaneo, Zaira, Silvia Bona, Corinna M. Bauer, et al.. (2014). Symmetry Detection in Visual Impairment: Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates. Symmetry. 6(2). 427–443. 13 indexed citations
5.
Cattaneo, Zaira, et al.. (2012). The effect of vertical and horizontal symmetry on memory for tactile patterns in late blind individuals. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 75(2). 375–382. 11 indexed citations
6.
Herbert, Andrew M., et al.. (2012). Eye contact and video-mediated communication: A review. Displays. 34(2). 177–185. 90 indexed citations
7.
Cattaneo, Zaira, Giulia Mattavelli, Costanza Papagno, Andrew M. Herbert, & Juha Silvanto. (2011). The role of the human extrastriate visual cortex in mirror symmetry discrimination: A TMS-adaptation study. Brain and Cognition. 77(1). 120–127. 46 indexed citations
8.
Herbert, Andrew M., et al.. (2010). A Stroop analog task: Words versus facial expressions. Journal of Vision. 1(3). 279–279. 2 indexed citations
9.
McCulloch, Daphne L., Gordon N. Dutton, Michael S. Bradnam, et al.. (2007). A visual skills inventory for children with neurological impairments. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 49(10). 757–763. 38 indexed citations
10.
McCulloch, Daphne L., et al.. (2003). Event-related potentials (ERPs) to schematic faces in adults and children. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 51(1). 59–67. 19 indexed citations
11.
Herbert, Andrew M., Olga Overbury, Jai Singh, & Jocelyn Faubert. (2002). Aging and Bilateral Symmetry Detection. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 57(3). P241–P245. 30 indexed citations
12.
Barrett, Brendan T., David Whitaker, Paul V. McGraw, & Andrew M. Herbert. (1999). Discriminating mirror symmetry in foveal and extra-foveal vision. Vision Research. 39(22). 3737–3744. 20 indexed citations
13.
Faubert, Jocelyn & Andrew M. Herbert. (1999). The Peripheral Drift Illusion: A Motion Illusion in the Visual Periphery. Perception. 28(5). 617–621. 49 indexed citations
14.
Gurnsey, Rick, et al.. (1998). Bilateral symmetry embedded in noise is detected accurately only at fixation. Vision Research. 38(23). 3795–3803. 49 indexed citations
15.
Humphrey, G. Keith, et al.. (1998). The indirect McCollough effect: An examination of an associative account. Perception & Psychophysics. 60(7). 1188–1196. 3 indexed citations
16.
Herbert, Andrew M., et al.. (1998). A `passive' event-related potential?. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 28(1). 11–21. 6 indexed citations
17.
Dakin, Steven C. & Andrew M. Herbert. (1998). The spatial region of integration for visual symmetry detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 265(1397). 659–664. 77 indexed citations
18.
Humphrey, G. Keith, Lawrence A. Symons, Andrew M. Herbert, & Melvyn A. Goodale. (1996). A neurological dissociation between shape from shading and shape from edges. Behavioural Brain Research. 76(1-2). 117–125. 29 indexed citations
19.
Symons, Lawrence A., et al.. (1994). Text-contingent color aftereffects: A reexamination. Perception & Psychophysics. 56(4). 405–413. 7 indexed citations
20.
Herbert, Andrew M., G. Keith Humphrey, & Pierre Jolicœur. (1994). The detection of bilateral symmetry: Effects of surrounding frames.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 48(1). 140–148. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026