Anirvan S. Nandy
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Bosco S. TjanJohn H. ReynoldsThomas F. DensonWilliam C. PedersenJonathan J. NassiMiYoung KwonJude F. MitchellTatyana O. Sharpee
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (18 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaItaly
In The Last Decade
Anirvan S. Nandy
27 papers receiving 825 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Cognitive Neuroscience 656
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
- Social Psychology 122
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 95
- Sociology and Political Science 83
Countries citing papers authored by Anirvan S. Nandy
This map shows the geographic impact of Anirvan S. Nandy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anirvan S. Nandy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anirvan S. Nandy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anirvan S. Nandy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anirvan S. Nandy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anirvan S. Nandy. The network helps show where Anirvan S. Nandy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anirvan S. Nandy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anirvan S. Nandy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anirvan S. Nandy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anirvan S. Nandy. Anirvan S. Nandy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 102 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 73 | |
| 15 | 97 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 181 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 80 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Anirvan S. Nandy
Anirvan S. Nandy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (18 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (656 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations). Anirvan S. Nandy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Bosco S. Tjan, John H. Reynolds, Thomas F. Denson, William C. Pedersen, Jonathan J. Nassi, MiYoung Kwon, Jude F. Mitchell, Tatyana O. Sharpee, Monika P. Jadi and Zhong‐Lin Lu. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Neuron and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.