Pepper Williams

1.5k total citations
13 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Pepper Williams is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Pepper Williams has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Pepper Williams's work include Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Pepper Williams is often cited by papers focused on Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Pepper Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Pepper Williams's co-authors include Michael J. Tarr, L. Gauthier, William G. Hayward, James Tanaka, James W. Tanaka, Daniel Weiskopf, Daniel J. Simons, John G. Seamon, Michael J. Crowley and Marlene Behrmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Neuroscience, Trends in Cognitive Sciences and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Pepper Williams

13 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Pepper Williams United States	11	876	358	239	176	145	13	1.1k
A. H. C. van der Heijden Netherlands	23	1.7k 1.9×	651 1.8×	177 0.7×	317 1.8×	210 1.4×	66	2.0k
James D. St. James United States	6	1.2k 1.4×	329 0.9×	153 0.6×	195 1.1×	82 0.6×	9	1.4k
Vera Maljkovic United States	10	2.2k 2.5×	556 1.6×	419 1.8×	255 1.4×	129 0.9×	17	2.5k
Nuala Brady Ireland	19	1.1k 1.3×	312 0.9×	232 1.0×	317 1.8×	195 1.3×	44	1.4k
Frank Papenmeier Germany	18	539 0.6×	246 0.7×	110 0.5×	203 1.2×	142 1.0×	53	832
Casimir J. H. Ludwig United Kingdom	23	1.4k 1.6×	341 1.0×	238 1.0×	163 0.9×	119 0.8×	55	1.7k
Bart Farell United States	16	1.3k 1.5×	326 0.9×	206 0.9×	231 1.3×	276 1.9×	61	1.6k
Sergei Gepshtein United States	19	1.1k 1.3×	326 0.9×	161 0.7×	256 1.5×	68 0.5×	49	1.4k
Cindy M. Bukach United States	14	1.2k 1.4×	674 1.9×	319 1.3×	241 1.4×	173 1.2×	31	1.4k
Sang Chul Chong South Korea	21	1.9k 2.1×	514 1.4×	339 1.4×	376 2.1×	74 0.5×	84	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Pepper Williams

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pepper Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pepper Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pepper Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pepper Williams

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pepper Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pepper Williams. The network helps show where Pepper Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pepper Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pepper Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pepper Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pepper Williams. Pepper Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Behrmann, Marlene & Pepper Williams. (2007). Impairments in part–whole representations of objects in two cases of integrative visual agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 24(7). 701–730. 33 indexed citations

2.

Tanaka, James W., Daniel Weiskopf, & Pepper Williams. (2001). The role of color in high-level vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 5(5). 211–215. 204 indexed citations

3.

Hayward, William G. & Pepper Williams. (2000). Viewpoint Dependence and Object Discriminability. Psychological Science. 11(1). 7–12. 75 indexed citations

4.

Williams, Pepper & Daniel J. Simons. (2000). Detecting Changes in Novel, Complex Three-dimensional Objects. Visual Cognition. 7(1-3). 297–322. 98 indexed citations

5.

Williams, Pepper & Michael J. Tarr. (1999). Orientation-specific possibility priming for novel three-dimensional objects. Perception & Psychophysics. 61(5). 963–976. 14 indexed citations

6.

Gauthier, L., Pepper Williams, Michael J. Tarr, & James Tanaka. (1998). Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research. 38(15-16). 2401–2428. 314 indexed citations

7.

Williams, Pepper, L. Gauthier, & Michael J. Tarr. (1998). Feature learning during the acquisition of perceptual expertise. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 21(1). 40–41. 2 indexed citations

8.

Tarr, Michael J., Pepper Williams, William G. Hayward, & L. Gauthier. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience. 1(4). 275–277. 179 indexed citations

9.

Williams, Pepper & Michael J. Tarr. (1997). Structural processing and implicit memory for possible and impossible figures.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 23(6). 1344–1361. 12 indexed citations

10.

Williams, Pepper & Michael J. Tarr. (1997). Structural processing and implicit memory for possible and impossible figures.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 23(6). 1344–1361. 55 indexed citations

11.

Rinck, Mike, Pepper Williams, Gordon H. Bower, & Eni S. Becker. (1996). Spatial situation models and narrative understanding: Some generalizations and extensions. Discourse Processes. 21(1). 23–55. 40 indexed citations

12.

Seamon, John G., et al.. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 21(3). 711–721. 8 indexed citations

13.

Seamon, John G., et al.. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 21(3). 711–721. 110 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact