Andrew M. Brunner

442 total citations
27 papers, 244 citations indexed

About

Andrew M. Brunner is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew M. Brunner has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 244 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Geometry and Topology, 8 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 7 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics. Recurrent topics in Andrew M. Brunner's work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (14 papers), semigroups and automata theory (6 papers) and Finite Group Theory Research (6 papers). Andrew M. Brunner is often cited by papers focused on Geometric and Algebraic Topology (14 papers), semigroups and automata theory (6 papers) and Finite Group Theory Research (6 papers). Andrew M. Brunner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Andrew M. Brunner's co-authors include Said N. Sidki, Jonathan Simon, R. G. Burns, Michael Frame, John G. Ratcliffe, James McCool, David A. Leonard, Marcio Andrade‐Campos, Simon Smith and Michelle Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Pacific Journal of Mathematics.

In The Last Decade

Andrew M. Brunner

24 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Andrew M. Brunner United States	11	170	99	98	83	32	27	244
James McCool Canada	10	277 1.6×	190 1.9×	95 1.0×	113 1.4×	23 0.7×	30	334
Jon McCammond United States	10	207 1.2×	132 1.3×	65 0.7×	113 1.4×	36 1.1×	28	252
Enrique Artal Bartolo Spain	8	188 1.1×	87 0.9×	33 0.3×	104 1.3×	56 1.8×	45	215
Miklós Abért Hungary	8	172 1.0×	148 1.5×	53 0.5×	87 1.0×	18 0.6×	28	247
Martin Edjvet United Kingdom	10	182 1.1×	119 1.2×	58 0.6×	111 1.3×	16 0.5×	42	216
Randall McCutcheon United States	10	163 1.0×	104 1.1×	61 0.6×	191 2.3×	44 1.4×	36	233
C. Kearton United Kingdom	10	240 1.4×	162 1.6×	35 0.4×	51 0.6×	16 0.5×	35	261
David Joyce United States	4	409 2.4×	264 2.7×	131 1.3×	154 1.9×	65 2.0×	6	443
N. S. Romanovskiĭ Russia	12	249 1.5×	175 1.8×	81 0.8×	195 2.3×	96 3.0×	49	358
William Jockusch United States	5	121 0.7×	79 0.8×	58 0.6×	225 2.7×	124 3.9×	7	248

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew M. Brunner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew M. Brunner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew M. Brunner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew M. Brunner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew M. Brunner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew M. Brunner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew M. Brunner. The network helps show where Andrew M. Brunner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew M. Brunner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew M. Brunner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew M. Brunner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew M. Brunner. Andrew M. Brunner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Leonard, David A., David A. Sallman, Najla H. Al Ali, et al.. (2024). Efficacy of Luspatercept on Transfusion Burden and Cytopenias in Intermediate, High, and Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood. 144(Supplement 1). 6714–6714.

Amrein, Philip C., Andrew M. Brunner, Amir T. Fathi, et al.. (2024). Retrospective Single-Institution Review of Bosutinib Dose Optimization for Efficacy and Safety with Dose Ramp-up and Titration. Blood. 144(Supplement 1). 6591–6591.

Brunner, Andrew M., Yiwen Liu, Jacqueline S. Garcia, et al.. (2024). Clinical Activity and Safety of the Oral ATR Inhibitor Ceralasertib (AZD6738) in Patients with MDS or CMML after Prior HMA Therapy. Blood. 144(Supplement 1). 1833–1833. 1 indexed citations

Brunner, Andrew M. & Said N. Sidki. (2010). Abelian state-closed subgroups of automorphisms of $m$-ary trees. Groups Geometry and Dynamics. 4(3). 455–472. 4 indexed citations

Brunner, Andrew M. & Said N. Sidki. (2002). Wreath operations in the group of automorphisms of the binary tree. Journal of Algebra. 257(1). 51–64. 4 indexed citations

Brunner, Andrew M., et al.. (1999). A just-nonsolvable torsion-free group defined on the binary tree. Journal of Algebra. 211(1). 99–114. 19 indexed citations

Brunner, Andrew M. & Said N. Sidki. (1997). On the Automorphism Group of the One-Rooted Binary Tree. Journal of Algebra. 195(2). 465–486. 14 indexed citations

Brunner, Andrew M.. (1997). The Double Cover of S³ Branched along a Link. Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications. 6(5). 599–619. 1 indexed citations

Brunner, Andrew M.. (1992). A two-generator presentation for the Picard group. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 115(1). 45–46. 4 indexed citations

10.

Brunner, Andrew M., et al.. (1985). Polyhedral groups and graph amalgamation products. Topology and its Applications. 20(3). 289–304. 18 indexed citations

11.

Brunner, Andrew M., et al.. (1984). Classifying torsion-free subgroups of the Picard group. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 282(1). 205–235. 20 indexed citations

12.

Brunner, Andrew M., et al.. (1984). Classifying Torsion-Free Subgroups of the Picard Group. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 282(1). 205–205. 11 indexed citations

13.

Brunner, Andrew M., et al.. (1982). Knot groups inS⁴with nontrivial homology. Pacific Journal of Mathematics. 103(2). 315–324. 34 indexed citations

14.

Brunner, Andrew M. & John G. Ratcliffe. (1982). Finite 2-complexes with infinitely-generated groups of self-homotopy-equivalences. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 86(3). 525–530. 2 indexed citations

15.

Brunner, Andrew M.. (1980). On a Class of One-Relator Groups. Canadian Journal of Mathematics. 32(2). 414–420. 16 indexed citations

16.

Burns, R. G. & Andrew M. Brunner. (1979). Two remarks on the group property of howson. Algebra and Logic. 18(5). 319–325. 4 indexed citations

17.

Brunner, Andrew M. & R. G. Burns. (1979). Groups in which every Finitely Generated Subgroup is almost a Free Factor. Canadian Journal of Mathematics. 31(6). 1329–1338. 6 indexed citations

18.

Brunner, Andrew M., et al.. (1977). Groups which are an infinite cyclic extension of a unique base group. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. 23(4). 499–503. 3 indexed citations

19.

Brunner, Andrew M.. (1977). On groups of Fibonacci type. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society. 20(3). 211–213. 9 indexed citations

20.

Brunner, Andrew M.. (1974). The determination of Fibonacci groups. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society. 11(1). 11–14. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact