830 total citations 55 papers, 309 citations indexed
About
Michael Hauskeller is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science.
According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Hauskeller has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Philosophy and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Michael Hauskeller's work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (17 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). Michael Hauskeller is often cited by papers focused on Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (17 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). Michael Hauskeller collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Michael Hauskeller's co-authors include Brian D. Earp and Christoph Rehmann‐Sutter and has published in prestigious journals such as The Hastings Center Report, The American Journal of Bioethics and Philosophy.
In The Last Decade
Michael Hauskeller
42 papers
receiving
267 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hauskeller
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hauskeller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hauskeller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hauskeller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hauskeller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hauskeller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hauskeller. The network helps show where Michael Hauskeller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Hauskeller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Hauskeller.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Hauskeller based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Hauskeller. Michael Hauskeller is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hauskeller, Michael. (2019). Living Like a Dog: Can the Life of Non-Human Animals Be Meaningful?. DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University). 23(1). 1.
4.
Hauskeller, Michael, et al.. (2018). Moral Enhancement: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
5.
Hauskeller, Michael. (2017). How to Become a Post-Dog. Animals in Transhumanism. Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter). 20(1). 2.6 indexed citations
Hauskeller, Michael. (2007). Biotechnology and the Integrity of Life: Taking Public Fears Seriously. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).11 indexed citations
Hauskeller, Michael, et al.. (1998). Naturerkenntnis und Natursein.. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation).2 indexed citations
20.
Hauskeller, Michael. (1997). Geschichte der Ethik: Antike.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.