Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view
1988659 citationsKarlene Ball, Bettina L. Beard et al.Journal of the Optical Society of America Aprofile →
Using MODIS Terra 250 m imagery to map concentrations of total suspended matter in coastal waters
2004538 citationsRichard L. Miller, Brent A. McKeeprofile →
Ridge Preservation with Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft and a Collagen Membrane Compared to Extraction Alone for Implant Site Development: A Clinical and Histologic Study in Humans
2003533 citationsRichard L. Miller et al.profile →
Thymidine kinase from herpes simplex virus phosphorylates the new antiviral compound, 9-(2-hydroxyethoxymethyl)guanine.
1978476 citationsRichard L. Miller, Gertrude B. Elion et al.profile →
Formation of Austenite During Intercritical Annealing of Dual-Phase Steels
1981440 citationsRichard L. Miller et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard L. Miller
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard L. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard L. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard L. Miller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard L. Miller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard L. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard L. Miller. The network helps show where Richard L. Miller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard L. Miller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard L. Miller.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard L. Miller based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard L. Miller. Richard L. Miller is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Miller, Richard L., et al.. (2008). Contrasting Perspectives on Mentoring New Faculty. The journal of faculty development. 22(2). 135.2 indexed citations
2.
Miller, Richard L., et al.. (2008). Techniques for encouraging peer collaboration: online threaded discussion or fishbowl interaction. Journal of instructional psychology. 35(1). 87–93.17 indexed citations
3.
Hobson, P. R., et al.. (2007). CITI Course in the Responsible Conduct of Research. 6.1 indexed citations
Miller, Richard L., et al.. (2003). Predictors of Success in Online Learning. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2003(1). 1546–1549.
7.
Forrest, Krista D. & Richard L. Miller. (2003). Not Another Group Project: Why Good Teachers Should Care about Bad Group Experiences. Teaching of Psychology. 30(3). 244–246.19 indexed citations
Ball, Karlene, et al.. (1988). Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 5(12). 2210–2210.659 indexed citations breakdown →
Miller, Richard L.. (1972). Congressional Reform: Toward a Modern Congress. The Notre Dame law review. 47(3). 588.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.