Andrew Graham
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Claire HughesRosie EnsorJohn R. HodgesGuy WilliamsRhys DaviesKim S. GrahamVictoria L. ScahillMike Weiner
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Andrew Graham
13 papers receiving 863 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Psychiatry and Mental health 375
- Cognitive Neuroscience 285
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 257
- Education 205
- Physiology 182
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Graham
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Graham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Graham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Graham. The network helps show where Andrew Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Graham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Graham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Graham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Graham. Andrew Graham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | Conservative Holiness Pastors' Ability to Assess Depression and their Willingness to Refer to Mental Health Professionals | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 85 | |
| 8 | 331 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | 142 | |
| 13 | 208 | |
| 14 | The CAD Framework Initiative standards: progress toward first publication at year end | 2 |
About Andrew Graham
Andrew Graham is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (375 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (257 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (285 citations). Andrew Graham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Claire Hughes, Rosie Ensor, John R. Hodges, Guy Williams, Rhys Davies, Kim S. Graham, Victoria L. Scahill, Mike Weiner, Bruce L. Miller and Sharon Erzinçlioğlu. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders and Developmental Neuropsychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.